Blog Image

Stockport Council News

Taking Mr Parnell back to court shortly before his death

Town Hall Protester Posted on Sun, February 22, 2015 08:49

Email received – 04 April 2013 17:15

Dear Sheila

Hello Mike here, I hope you are well. I feel a lot better
because today a great stress was lifted. What is derogatory when the council
can report me to the police and ask for my arrest contrary to s4A POA 1986 and
today at the revived trial in Stockport Magistrates Court I was acquitted in
less than 5 minutes of that allegation. So the false reporting was to divert the
true course of justice. If the council’s pointing finger is not defamatory
because I’m not an official, then my arrest was and now the courts have made it
official. I will have the requested memorandum to show, so the council’s hate
crime towards myself will end them in court and then we will see who has been
true full in doing and intent – (defamation to damage a person’s true character
is unacceptable)

Restored character lawful citizen, Mike,
(Learning
law from questioning the council’s lawlessness)

Bent, nasty and vicious LibDems.



Every Council’s Expenditure over £500

Expenditure over £500 Posted on Sun, February 22, 2015 08:43

http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/sep/10/local-council-spending-over-500-list#data



Can you see where your money goes? Can you Buxton!

NPS Stockport Posted on Sun, February 22, 2015 08:02

NPS Group receives a large amount of public money, but doesn’t consider itself subject to the Freedom of Information Act or Environmental Information Regulations 2004. They get round their obligations using a Teckal Exemption which states: – ‘a. in order to satisfy the first condition of the Teckal exemption, the controlling contracting authority (or contracting authorities) must possess “a power of decisive influence over both strategic objectives and significant decisions of the other legal entity” (i.e., the more independently the entity in question is able to act, the less likely it is for the Teckal examption to apply).’

We see from the reports below from Devon County Council, Norfolk County Council and Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council that they possess very little power of decisive influence – they don’t seem to have a clue what is going on.

There appear to be very serious problems with NPS Stockport and NPS South West.

I questioned Stockport Council regarding overcharging by NPS on the toxic waste dump school at North Reddish for a very shoddy job. The Council Solicitor, Barry Khan, the Chief Executive Eamonn Boylan, the Leader Susan Derbyshire and the rest of the Executive Councillors knew of the problems with NPS, yet they branded my questions on this matter “vexatious”.



Can you see where your money goes? Can you Buxton!

NPS Stockport Posted on Sun, February 22, 2015 08:02

NPS Group receives a large amount of public money, but doesn’t consider itself subject to the Freedom of Information Act or Environmental Information Regulations 2004. They get round their obligations using a Teckal Exemption which states: – ‘a. in order to satisfy the first condition of the Teckal exemption, the controlling contracting authority (or contracting authorities) must possess “a power of decisive influence over both strategic objectives and significant decisions of the other legal entity” (i.e., the more independently the entity in question is able to act, the less likely it is for the Teckal examption to apply).’

We see from the reports below from Devon County Council, Norfolk County Council and Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council that they possess very little power of decisive influence – they don’t seem to have a clue what is going on.

There appear to be very serious problems with NPS Stockport and NPS South West.

I questioned Stockport Council regarding overcharging by NPS on the toxic waste dump school at North Reddish for a very shoddy job. The Council Solicitor, Barry Khan, the Chief Executive Eamonn Boylan, the Leader Susan Derbyshire and the rest of the Executive Councillors knew of the problems with NPS, yet they branded my questions on this matter “vexatious”.