Blog Image

Stockport Council News

It was “vexatious” to ask the suspect Stockport LibDems why contamination investigations had not complied with the required British Standard.

LibDem Councillors, Vale View School Posted by Sheila OliverPosted on Wed, May 12, 2021 19:36

GMGU – Greater Manchester Geological Unit was in part funded by Stockport Council.

BS10175 states that contamination investigations must be done on a strict grid pattern. This was not done at the new toxic waste dump primary school site. There were no trial pits dug over the football field, which where the school was going and which was directly over the rubbish in-filled clay pits at the former Jackson’s Brickworks.

The ///////// lines are where the old clay pits were. Directly where the school was going.

TP 5 wasn’t dug at all and the CBR findings are for land stability and not contamination, so no grid pattern at all.


It was “vexatious” to ask the iffy Stockport LibDems why carbon dioxide levels of 14.7%v/v were accepted by them despite their own council guidelines of 0.5%v/v.

LibDem Councillors, Vale View School Posted by Sheila OliverPosted on Wed, May 12, 2021 19:18

Stockport Council’s own guidance on carbon dioxide exposure, (written for a sister site at Midland Road), does not recommend exposure levels above 0.5%v/v. The carbon dioxide levels for the new, still gassing toxic waste dump school were 14.7%v/v.



When I started asking questions about their suspect planning, the LibDems had to try to shut me up.

LibDem Councillors, Vale View School Posted by Sheila OliverPosted on Wed, May 12, 2021 16:04

I asked a question at the Executive Council meeting (all LibDem councillors). Mark Hunter, then Council Leader and John Schulz, Chief Executive, said I had been so rude to a council officer that I may never contact another Stockport Council employee ever again. There was no appeals process and no time limit to this ban.

“Goodness, Sheila, what have you done”, asked excellent Stockport Express reporter Peter Devine. “I have been asking questions about the school”, I replied, “and they don’t like it”.

When I threatened to sue them for defamation – this was said at a public meeting – they backed down completely and had to find another way to shut me up.