From GMGU’s proof of evidence from David Woolrich at the public inquiry in 2006 regarding the sister site at Adswood:- “Very few sites are so badly contaminated that they cannot be reused at all, but the choice of a new use may be restricted by contamination as well as other planning considerations and the consequent financial implication. That …..must include the longterm financial consequences for the site occupants.”
No mention of this problem for the school site.
I asked but it was deemed “vexatious”.
