I really don’t think LibDem Stockport Council actually spent the £200k on drainage at the toxic waste dump school site, but it is apparently “vexatious” of me to raise this issue.
Stockport LibDems claim it is “vexatious” of me to raise drainage issues
Vale View School Posted on Tue, March 10, 2015 17:08- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1559
- Share
Still, vexatious to mention asbestos to the corrupt LibDem run council
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 19:20
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1535
- Share
And the corrupt LibDems at Stockport wouldn’t listen
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 19:19
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1534
- Share
The toxic waste dump site contractors only needed liability insurance of £5m – the same as you need for a market stall
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 19:17
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1533
- Share
Deadly brown asbestos left in situ and it is “vexatious” to mention this to corrupt LibDems
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 19:15Contracters then sifted the deadly material by hand –
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0rCPnP5H9o
Come on! How could they recognise the material, especially when the experts couldn’t?
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1532
- Share
Bill for the toxic minefield school hits £8.5m (it then went up to £10m)
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 19:12It probably went way above £10m but the corrupt Stockport LibDems won’t answer questions on it – “vexatious”.
It is inconceivable that the school would actually be built following “failure to detect toxics” – the tests were obviously unreliable especially having failed and caused the reckless plans to go ahead. By then the financial aspects of this new project were too great to resist, especially backed by the extraordinary claim by the Council that the old industrial tip site could be made safe and used.
The Council had commissioned soil tests and found no contamination! There was the influence of the Government grant of £2.2 million already in the till and even spent on something else. But more soil tests, only carried out because the Council had to prove to a diversion of footpath public inquiry that the site was not contaminated found a variety of chemicals -lead, arsenic and brown asbestos. What on earth were the previous experts – Greater Manchester Geological Unit – doing to have missed all this or should the question be who was in the pocket of whom?
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1531
- Share
Stupid LibDem Councillor insists primary school site is safe
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 19:01He was proved wrong but being a LibDem he didn’t apologise.
Never vote LibDem – not to be trusted and is not much of a chemist either.
http://interactive.stockport.gov.uk/edrms/onlinemvm/getimage.asp?DocumentNumber=195267
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1530
- Share
This is another sister site to the one the corrupt LibDems put the school on
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 18:59- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1529
- Share