http://www.sheilaoliver.org/missing–201,750-.html
But I will keep trying to. Over £200k is a very large financial irregularity.
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/missing–201,750-.html
But I will keep trying to. Over £200k is a very large financial irregularity.
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/goddard-covering-up.html
LibDems = what can I say except never vote for them.
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/obvious-concern-over-funding.html
LibDem run Stockport Council – completely unaccountable.
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/cost-now–10m.html
The cost is £10m with no proper explanation of this ludicrous rise. A bigger school built several years later is to cost £8m. At this point Stockport Council was still lying that the site was not contaminated, although they had refused three planning applications in the early 1970s due to the contaminated nature of the site.
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/5-months-later-cost-is–8.2m.html
The primary school which was to have cost £5.5m is now £8.2m just five months later. The rise in cost is not to deal with the contamination remediation for this primary school built directly over still gassing, in-filled claypits, because at this stage Stockport Council was still lying that the site was not contaminated.
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/rise-in-cost–5.5m-to–7.5m-in-2-months.html
Don’t ask why the cost of a new primary school has risen from £5m to £10m over a few months. Don’t be vexatious.
These documents can be more easily read here:- http://www.sheilaoliver.org/-5.5-to–10m.html
Don’t ask why the cost of a new primary school has risen from £5m to £10m over a few months. Don’t be vexatious.
These documents can be more easily read here:-