Blog Image

Stockport Council News

Further correspondence with the Learning Skills Council

Aquinas College Posted on Mon, October 07, 2013 20:22

30 January 2009 08:20
Dear Ms Bracewell

Another issue to maybe raise at the meeting. Local people will be claiming compensation under Part 1 of the Land Compensation Act 1973 for loss of house value, noise and light disturbance etc etc once the new college is operational.

One of the key factors in their claim will be the loss of local open space (as far as I can see unlawful loss of local open space, as in the town’s Unitary Development Plan it clearly states that replacement local open space would have to be provided for current users, who were dog walkers). I I don’t know whether the College or the Goverment would pay the compensation payable as a result of public works. However, I think that will be a main factor in the compensation claims, as there is no other local open space for miles.

So, to minimise any future claims may I suggest that Aquinas sets aside replacement local open space for public use of exactly the same size as that lost and designs this at this stage to minimise cost of changing the layout later. If they don’t I think the college/governement will eventually pay quite a high financial cost for that decision.

At no point in the planning process were the human rights of local residents taken into consideration, yet this is a planning obligation.

Many thanks and kind regards

Sheila



The LSC’s reply

Aquinas College Posted on Mon, October 07, 2013 20:21

January 27, 2009 8:52 PM

Thank you for your email. We are meeting with the college later this week and will raise with them your concerns.

Regards

Jane Bracewell



How Aquinas College wasted your money

Aquinas College Posted on Mon, October 07, 2013 20:18

Email sent to the Learning Skills Council, who funded the Aquinas College new building with our money.

27 January 2009 21:08

Dear Ms Bracewell

Due to the financial difficulties at the LSC, which I have been hearing about from Marple College and from the Guardian, could I please ask you to query the waste of money currently going on at the Aquinas College development site? They have a hired JCB (probably costing about £900 per week) playing pat-a-cake with a mound of soil – simply moving it around and patting it but not actually doing anything constructive. I don’t want to pay for a JCB to do this. Is it contamination that they don’t know what to do with? I really think some scrutiny should be exercised over what is going on there.

Kind regards

Sheila



Contamination remediation

Aquinas College Posted on Mon, October 07, 2013 20:13

Email sent to the planning officer responsible – 02 October 2008 16:15

Dear Ms Chase

Aquinas planning condition 5 states:-

No development shall take place until:-

a) a scheme for the investigation of the site to ascertain the type, location and quantitiy of all potential contaminants has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, b) the investigation has been undertaken by a suitably qualified person, c) a report of the investigation which shall incorporate recommendations for dealing with any contaminants identified has been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority and

d) a Validation Report has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority

All precautionary and remedial measures (whether relating to excavation and other site works, building development and construction, or otherwise) recommended or suggested by the report and assessment shall be taken or carried out in the course of the development unless otherwise approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. This includes the provision of a full system of traceability for identified and excavated contaminated materials (or otherwise) which are removed off site for disposal as part of an agreed remediation strategy.

Aquinas planning condition 7 states:-

No development shall take place until a Method Statement for the excavation works including the removal of contaminated materials off site……..has been submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority,

As development is currently taking place, SMBC must be in possession of the above-mentioned documentation. Under the FOIA and EIR 2004 could I please come to see these documents.

If SMBC is not in possession of these documents, then I assume the development will have to cease.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards

Sheila



More LibDem dodgy planning

Aquinas College Posted on Mon, October 07, 2013 19:18

Aquinas College – contaminated land, theft of public open space, built too big, failure to provide replacement playing fields. The usual planning abuse from Stockport Council.

Notes from visit to Hygarth House Planning Office to read Aquinas files

The site is divided into three zones – Zone A in the west which is currently the field and tennis courts where the school buildings will be going, Zone B, which is where the buildings are now, and Zone C which is the green area at the far side.

Zone A has the heaviest contamination. Zone B would have to be further investigated once the buildings currently on it are demolished, they don’t suspect much contamination in Zone C and the other end of the site.

In Zone A current site users should be advised of the potential risks and activities should include appropriate risk assessments (Faber Maunsell Geo-Environmental Interpretive Report Page 9). Inhalation of dust and/or vapours for current users – probability of risk being realised – Likely. Inhalation of ground gas – Likely. Direct contact of contaminated ground within ground structures and ecological receptors, current buildings and services adjacent to the site – Likely. (page 23 Faber Maunsell Geo-Environmental Interpretative Report).

In Area 1 of Zone A 35% of the material may be considered hazardous waste. (Faber Maunsell Remediation Update January 2008.)
The site has a history of foundation problems (Desk Study Report Ref 1).
There should be an asbestos risk register for the current building.
Potentially variable ground conditions particularly made ground and buried foundations/structures may pose a geotechnical hazard.

5 boreholes were sunk in total, 6 cable percussion boreholes, which are nothing to do with contamination but just to see how hard the ground is, 8 trial pits and 10 window samples.

Gas was not monitored in Zone B or Zone C.

Faber Maunsell Contamination Assessment Chapter 7 mentions the adjacent residential users and current site users.

In Zone B & C there is arsenic slightly above the human health criteria levels.

They say they have complied with Planning Policy Statement 23 – Planning and Pollution Control, and DEFRA Circular 01/2006 under Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, BS 1377, SNIFFER, CLR10 and Ground Gas CIRIA report C659.

Methane levels between <0.1 and 4.2v/v%. Elevated methane in boreholes 01 and 04.

CO2 levels <0.1 and 12.8v/v%. Elevated CO2 in boreholes 01, 02, 04, 05 and 06.

Waste Management Paper 27 recommends that private housing with gardens should not be constructed on landfill sites where the methane levels are in excess of 1% v/v or the carbon dioxide levels are in excess of 1.5% v/v., so the above figures are very high.

Zone A will need a topsoil strip and a re-levelling of earthworks across the Zone, excavation of made ground and removal. Applicable techniques – cover systems, hard cover screening, excavation, disposal off site and de-watering.

The College considers the playing fields to be the most vulnerable part of the college grounds as regards intruders.

Sport England says the facilities should be open to community access and a Community Use Agreement should be signed.

In a letter dated 25/01/08 to Peter Taylor, Planning Manager, West Area, SMBC Mr R G Hill the Assistant Principle at Aquinas said, regarding the cutting back of trees, which I believe has already been done, that prior to this action we will leaflet the neighbours informing them of what we are planning to do.

There is a press notice in the file stating that it is a departure from the UDP and a major development, but as far as I can tell it only went into the paper once in November.

The decision was taken to undertake this development three years earlier according to a document dated October 2007.

The Sports Hall is to remain as it is apparently.

Letter from XXXX, XXX Maple Close, Heaviley. “We currently have access to the playing fields via a gate at the rear of my property that has been there since the house was built.”

XXXX of XXX Soudan Road says this has been a recreational field for 70 years.

XXXX says it was bequeathed by Miss Annie Ward for the benefit of the people of Stockport.

The person at XXX Nangreave Road says the land was used in the past for carnivals, fairs and football etc.

XXXX of XXX Maple Close says:- “We also have to maintain an area of the field 5ft over our boundary fence which they have never cut or maintained in the last 6 years” and say that on their property deeds it states that that should be maintained as a green area.

From 7.3 of the contamination report:-

Copper, Lead, Zinc, Benz(a)anthracene, Benzo(b)fluaronthene, Benz(a)pyrene, Dibenzo(ah)anthrocene, Methylnaphthalene, Acenaphthane, Carbazole, Dibenzofuron – all found way above levels at which action must be taken.

12th May 2008 – Sheila Oliver

Once through the planning process the contamination remediation requirements were lessened.



Decided

Bredbury Fire/Pollution Posted on Mon, October 07, 2013 18:03

The application was decided but there was no site notice and no press notice. How very, very strange!



Who decided that then?

Bredbury Fire/Pollution Posted on Mon, October 07, 2013 18:00

Environmental Assessment: Environmental assessment not required


Agent

Bredbury Fire/Pollution Posted on Mon, October 07, 2013 17:56

Mr N Roberts
Axis Ped
Unit 5 Camilla House
76 Water Lane
Wilmslow
SK9 5BB


« PreviousNext »