Stockport Council News

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2014-12-11a.1924.0&s=%28section%3Adebates+section%3Awhall+section%3Alords+section%3Ani%29+speaker%3A25247#g1931.2

14 July 2010 09:26

Dear Mrs
Oliver,

I am writing in
response to your email below (ref DP 3152).

The consent you
provided from Mr Parnell was sent to the Council 12 months ago. With this in
mind, I have written to Mr Parnell to confirm that he still consents to the
Council releasing his personal and sensitive personal information to you. If the
Council receives this consent, I will contact you again to confirm that your
request on Mr Parnell’s behalf will proceed, at which point we will require the
statutory £10 fee.

Yours
sincerely,

Claire Naven

Claire
Naven

Data Protection &
Freedom of Information Officer

Stockport Metropolitan Borough
Council

14 July 2009 06:32

c.c. John Schulz

Dear Chief Constable

Mr Parnell had the police called to him twice
yesterday and the Council threatened a third time but when I said they would
have to arrest me too, they immediately backed down.

I don’t quite know what is going on here – Masonic
links maybe – but you are putting your career on the line for this madcap case.
The national press is now interested (evidence available on
request).

If we look at the costs of this case – and I will
in minute detail – 86 times the police have been called, 10 arrests, 2 court
cases and now – I am guessing the High Court costs – for a sneeze is a scandal!
I am sure you will be aware as I am of the mood of anger in the country in times
of deep recession with various fat cat chief executives, bent MPs and insane
waste of taxpayers’ hard earned money.

May I respectfully suggest that the police don’t
respond when called out by Stockport Council to Mr. Parnell. He has not been
allowed to walk on any pavement in the town. Have you any idea what the red top
press would make of that alone?

I shall be keeping a watching brief.

Yours sincerely

Sheila