Blog Image

Stockport Council News

Mr Parnell – what he needed

Town Hall Protester Posted on Fri, September 06, 2019 19:21:42
Stockport Council did this to Andrea Adams

Stockport Council did this to Alison Davies and her young son Ryan.

https://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/05/opinion/05mcgovern.html

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/apr/19/martinwainwright.mainsection

Mr Parnell only asked for counselling for his lovely, adopted daughters who had had a terrible time with their birth parents.

The Serious Case reviews of these two terrible incidents meant that Stockport Council in future agreed to help parents who came to them asking for assistance with children who had problems. Not what they did for sick, innocent Mr Parnell or his lovely family.

They framed and falsely imprisoned him for alleged assault with a sneeze, which CCTV they had showed hadn’t happened, and they refused to allow it to be shown at his trial – evidence exonerating him completely.

http://www.sheilaoliver.org/custodies,-arrests,-imprisonment-1.html

There was no ludicrous assault with a sneeze.



Mr Parnell RIP and the Home Office

Town Hall Protester Posted on Fri, September 06, 2019 19:01:27

http://www.sheilaoliver.org/custodies,-arrests,-imprisonment-1.html



Mr Parnell & the CPS

Town Hall Protester Posted on Thu, September 05, 2019 01:41:26

The Stockport CPS did this to sick, innocent Mr Parnell RIP for asking for his legal right to counselling for his lovely, troubled daughters, who were adopted from Stockport Council. There was a ?Masonic coming together of the Council, Magistrates Courts, Police and Crown Prosecution Service to deal with someone Stockport Council thought was being a nuisance to them, so they had him subjected to hundreds of custodies, dozens of arrests and repeated imprisonment for alleged assault with a sneeze. CCTV proving his innocence was not allowed to be shown at his initial magistrates’ court trial, despite Mr Parnell begging the Council, Police and CPS to allow it to be shown. The then Leader of the Council, now LibDem Lord Goddard, refused to allow it to be released.

There simply was no ludicrous assault with a sneeze.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/local-news/protester-cleared-in-court-of-sneezing-on-security-881018



Mr Parnell’s own words about the ludicrous assault with a sneeze charge

Town Hall Protester Posted on Sun, August 23, 2015 19:40:03

The corrupt Stockport LibDems knew there had been no assault with a sneeze. They had the CCTV of the incident which they refused to allow at the trial of Mr Parnell RIP:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA34fyU1eds

Crown Court Appeal

Manchester Crown Court

Minshull Street

Manchester

Appeal against conviction contrary to

Section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Common assault by sneezing

Innocent by plea as to the allegation

Case appealed in the interest of
justice

As to being disputed in not proved
beyond reasonable doubt to all submitted evidence

R v PARNELL

contrary to

Section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Common assault by sneezing

10th July 2009

Stockport Magistrates
Court

Edward Street

Stockport

I Michael Stewart Parnell appeal the
decision made against me to the allegation of common assault by sneezing with
intention to spread a cold to another

As contrary to section 39 criminal
Justice Act 1988

The reason for this Appeal is in the
interest of Justice and to preserve that right and for the Justice system not
to be abused by those that divert the course of fair justice

In this appeal I will show that an
injustice has been done either by or toward myself from others with their
intent to harm

My main reason of this Appeal is

I am innocent of all allegations made
against me and I will stay true to Justice and uphold the Queens
peace with honour

I pride myself that I respect the law
and will stay strong to that and not commit any offences against any person

How do I intend to show I am innocent

well firstly I give my word

I Michael Stewart Parnell

Do solemnly swear that I tell the
truth to my oath towards myself that I will always be truly honest in that
which I say and do

I Michael Stewart Parnell have not sneezed
on or towards any person and have not in any way intentionally or recklessly
sneezed or blown my nose on any person to cause them any harm alarm concerns or
distress

I have always conducted myself in
ways that respects all people politely and with dignity I am courteous towards
all other peoples needs and if I can will always help out and I receive
gratification from their thanks as my rewards people respect me for what I do
this is what I valve as a good quality

I pride myself of being of good character
that is approved by others and my life has been served to that of helping
others which I do enjoy and get my
rewards by doing

Why are allegations made against me

I believe there are those whose own
wrongdoing puts them to accountability
and their diversions are in their attempts the ways to discredit the way
in which I pursue dealing with those issues

Many people and also police officers
have commented that I have conducted myself exemplary and I am the most peaceful protester they
have ever come across and they complement me on how I behave

The issues with the other parties are
statutory in duty and in their failings not to deal with those issues they have
resorted to criminal acts in their attempts to divert the courts from their
true purpose as to enforce the laws and regulations in the UK

False allegations only serve one
purpose they damage hurt those they are directed towards to discredit our
freedom of rights

In this appeal what are the false
allegation disputed and by who were they fabricated and how do I prove they
acted maliciously

The allegation of the sneeze with the
intension to spread a cold that which was brought about after the failing that
previous allegations failed to have me moved away on that day because I was not
committing any crime allegations must be fabricated if the one making the
allegations knows of a crime before it
is apparent and suggests thats what will happen before it does

Allegation of a sneeze was made by
the two security guards now known to me as Mr Francis Craughwell

Mr Stephen Duggan

The false allegations are made to the police by that
which is now written in the security guards witness statements and also the MP3
and video recordings that have been gathered to support the detection and
prosecution of crime

How can I say that the allegations
made are false

The sneeze or the exhaling under
force down what is alleged to be my right nostril did not and could or would
have happened by me, if those making these allegations could imagine this would
happen from me then in their minds they are capable of fabricating such an
allegation because the possible outcome might be to serve their satisfaction to
discredit my cause and get rid of me once and for all, and is as stated by the
security guards to something that they are working towards

The security guards disrespect for
the law and their comments on tape stating that should be brought before court
as their bad character along with their other unlawfulness and many attacks on
my person under the pretence that they can get away with it only because they
are part of the big organisation and the one individual cant take on those who
have millions behind them



Email sent to the Lords Appointments Committee

Town Hall Protester Posted on Sun, August 16, 2015 08:37:49

Email sent to Lords Appointments Committee – 15/8/1508.30

Dear Sirs

I learn with genuine concern that Sir Andrew Stunell may be
in the running for a peerage. He was complicit in the bullying to death
of sick, innocent Mr Parnell aged just 58, who only asked Stockport Council for
counselling for his lovely, troubled daughters adopted from Stockport Council.

Also, as a junior minister at DCLG I provided him with
evidence of planning fraud and corruption by his political cohorts at
Stockport, yet he was wilfully blind to this.

I am happy to supply you with detailed evidence. This man is
definitely unsuitable for such a position and should he be granted a peerage, I
will make sure all this evidence is widely published across the Internet.

Kind regards

Yours faithfully

Sheila Oliver



Public inquiry into deaths in police custody – Cheadle Heath Police Station

Town Hall Protester Posted on Sun, August 02, 2015 11:12:43

Email sent – 2nd August 2015 08.58

Dear Home Secretary

I wish to submit evidence to the deaths in police custody
inquiry.

This is concerning Cheadle Heath Police Station at Stockport
where two people have died in custody as I understand it.

Mr
Michael Stuart Parnell RIP – a man Inspector Clitherow of Stockport Police has
admitted in writing was completely innocent – was repeatedly held in custody at
Cheadle Heath . The experiences terrified him and he attempted suicide
there. He did not die there – he died sometime later aged just 58.



You might want to have a look at which police officers were
on duty this night and see if they were on duty the other times people died in
custody.

Mr Parnell was used to death threats, beatings, offensive
language and other threats on a daily basis in his dealings with Stockport
Council. Video evidence below:-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpglhgaXpmw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NHpyKSvnjg

https://youtu.be/bOBbKq5Cleg

https://youtu.be/7GoNlgLKOwM

Mr Parnell was used to being set up, arrested and imprisoned
for offences/crimes that hadn’t taken place:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YY4dhCpcKk&feature=youtu.be

On this occasion below Mr Parnell was sent to prison for an
offence that Stockport Council, Stockport Police, Stockport CPS and Stockport
Magistrates Court knew hadn’t taken place. They had CCTV to prove it
hadn’t taken place but that was not allowed to be shown at his original
trial. It was later shown at his three day Manchester Crown Court appeal
and he was acquitted of the ludicrous offence of assault with a sneeze:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA34fyU1eds

Absolutely nothing happened – no assault – nothing.

Mr Parnell was sent to prison for this offence – a very sick
man. His council protest was in trying to get counselling help for
his lovely, troubled daughters adopted from Stockport Council. The
prisoners at Forest Bank knew his case involved children and because he was
such a sick man he was taken straight to the prison hospital. The other
prisoners believed him to be a paedophile and he was treated accordingly.
In time the other prisoners came to like and respect him, as did the prison
officers, and believe in his innocence. They thought the councillors,
senior council officers, senior police and CPS officials were scum, and who can
argue with that interpretation?

Mr
Parnell was finally released due to his ill health but had to endure two years
8am to 8pm house arrest. He couldn’t even attend his dentist. He was
banned from entering the centre of the town, wasn’t allowed to attend medical
appointments:

These are just some of his custodies and arrests – a man
admitted by Inspector Clitherow to have been completely innocent:

http://www.sheilaoliver.org/custodies,-arrests,-imprisonment.html

Mr Parnell just wanted counselling for his lovely daughters
who had had a terrible time with their birth parents. A simple request.
One of the girls had the wrong details on her birth documents so if he took her
to A & E she didn’t exist. After 10 years of being ignored by
Stockport Council (it is how they operate) he decided to stand on the Town Hall
steps until someone helped him. He continued to be ignored until Dave
Goddard became leader – a man named under Parliamentary Privilege as a cohort
of a notorious gangster by Andrew Bennett MP. The gangster was Douggie Flood, a
member of the Manchester Quality Street Gang. Mr Flood’s family in a
court case over his estate admitted that their father had indeed been a
gangster.

When
Goddard became Leader the vicious treatment of Mr Parnell began. Can’t we stop
him protesting he is stated as saying in the Council Log:-


Mr Parnell attended every council meeting when he was not in
custody or in prison to beg for help for his family. Their only response
was to arrest him for things like trying to leave a council meeting early or
using the town hall loo. I can proved he attended these meetings to beg
for help and Stockport Council had a legal duty to provide it to him:



http://www.sheilaoliver.org/begging-stockport-council-for-help.html

In addition, I was writing to the Council every day to beg
them to stop this treatment of a sick, innocent man who was only asking for his
legal right to counselling for his children. The corrupt council officer tasked
with sorting out his problem and who did nothing reported me to the Information
Commission for nuisance contact with the Council. I offered to work
on Mr Parnell’s behalf to sort out his simple problem but they refused to let
me. His local MP, a useless man at the best of times, refused to
challenge the actions of his political cohorts.

How did Councillor Goddard, on the Police Authority, get to
waste possible 1000s of police man hours on a personal vendetta against an
innocent man he had a legal duty to help and he was paid to help. He has
now been elevated to the Peerage, yet Nick Clegg was fully informed of what he
had been up to. How can such a lawbreaker have been elevated to the
position of lawmaker? Would we have such a terrible situation in
Manchester currently in gun crime etc if Fahy had used those valuable resources
to tackle crime instead of acting as henchman for his ?Masonic chum Goddard?

After Mr Parnell’s acquittal they continued their vicious
treatment of him unabated. When I hounded the Chief Constable Fahy about
the waste of police time, eventually he stopped arresting Mr Parnell but he
allowed the police to continue to attend the ludicrous council call-outs.
It will be a good day for the people of Greater Manchester when he
leaves. When they could no longer have him arrested, the Council
falsified council tax arrears and continued to hound him that way with constant
court cases and, again, it will be a good day for Stockport when our
Magistrates Court closes, as then grubby and corrupt local politicians won’t be
able to use the courts as their henchmen. The Council even hounded him whilst
terminally ill in Intensive Care over £24 he didn’t own in the full knowledge
of the seriousness of his condition.

So, although Mr
Parnell didn’t die in police custody at Cheadle Heath, he did attempt suicide
there and of all the terrible things that happened to him done by
corrupt-at-the-top Stockport Council, being in custody at Cheadle Heath Police
Station scared him the most.

Yours sincerely

Sheila Oliver

c.c. to Tim Farron LibDem Leader 2/8/15 08.58, although he had been informed of this dozens of times previously and took no action.

Tim Farron received this email. Will he finally take action and expel Stunell, Goddard, Derbyshire, Pantall, Candler, Meikle, Roberts, Derbyshire et al from his party? Only if he is an honest man.



Security guard happy slaps a manager. Stockport Council run by cowboys

Town Hall Protester Posted on Fri, July 31, 2015 20:37:16

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpglhgaXpmw

These vicious security guards were allowed by corrupt Roberts, Derbyshire, Goddard et al to continue to make false allegations about Mr Parnell until he died, even though they had been found to have committed perjury at his Crown Court Appeal.

Corrupt and vicious LibDem run Stockport Council.



CCTV proving his innocence not allowed to be shown at his trial

Town Hall Protester Posted on Fri, July 31, 2015 06:43:09

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA34fyU1eds

This is the Stockport Council CCTV of the ludicrous alleged assault with a sneeze of which Mr Parnell was accused, found guilty and sent to prison. At a three day Manchester Crown Court appeal when this CTV footage was finally shown and the Stockport Council guards were proved to have threatened him and committed perjury Mr Parnell was acquitted.

My question for corruptly vicious Stockport Council is why wasn’t this CCTV footage allowed to be shown at Mr Parnell’s original trial. Corruptly vicious at the top Stockport Council had this footage, knew no assault had taken place and Mr Parnell begged the Council, Police, CPS to have it shown at his trial. It wasn’t

I can only assume there is Masonic linkage between then Leader, Lord Goddard, the Stockport CPS, the Stockport Police and the Stockport Magistrate’s Court (now due to close thank goodness).

There must have been a conspiracy to dispose of a chap who had the audacity to ask corrupt Lord Goddard for counselling for his lovely, then troubled daughters adopted from Stockport Council.



Next »