So, to correctly state a school is being built too small for those who need to attend (why build it then?), that it is at least £5m over-budget (why?), that the traffic situation being created around the school is a lethal one (as the police admitted within weeks of the new school opening) and that it shouldn’t have been built on a still-gassing, former toxic waste dump site entirely contaminated with arsenic, lead and brown asbestos has been for many years (and still is) considered “vexatious” by LibDem run Stockport Council.
The non-removal of the lethal brown asbestos fibres:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0rCPnP5H9o
and the background dodgyness:-
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/blocking-information.html
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/contamination.html
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/drainage-problems.html
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/financial-irregularities.html
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/foi-abuses.html
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/how-did-it-pass-planning-.html
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/miscellaneous-shenanigans.html
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/miscellaneous-shenanigans-2.html
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/no-playing-fields.html
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/not-big-enough-one-year-on.html
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/traffic.html
