So, to correctly state a school is being built too small for those who need to attend (why build it then?), that it is at least £5m over-budget (why?), that the traffic situation being created around the school is a lethal one (as the police admitted within weeks of the new school opening) and that it shouldn’t have been built on a still-gassing, former toxic waste dump site entirely contaminated with arsenic, lead and brown asbestos has been for many years (and still is) considered “vexatious” by LibDem run Stockport Council.

The non-removal of the lethal brown asbestos fibres:-

and the background dodgyness:-