The school went directly over the rubbish infilled claypits
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 17:29- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1519
- Share
Some of the serious issues raised with Stockport Council over the toxic waste dump school.
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 17:22http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/methane_gas_monitors_at_vale_vie#incoming-220341
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/vale_vew_school#comment-23672
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/toxic_waste_dump_primary_school#comment-24175
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1518
- Share
GMGU are not experts – why use them then?
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 15:46Why employ them to investigate a site involving airborne contaminants then? Because you don’t want them to find the airborne contaminants. Bent Stockport Council.
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1517
- Share
Bent Council fails to inform planning committee not to decide application
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 15:44The Council “forgot” to tell the Environment Agency about the plan to build the school on toxic waste, although BS 10175, which they claim to have complied with, states the EA should have been informed at the outset.
When the Environment Agency emailed the Council to tell them not to decide the application on grounds of contamination, the Council “forgot” to inform the Planning Committee.
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1516
- Share
GMGU complied with national standards on contamination investigation? No, they didn’t or they would have found it the first time
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 15:41 
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1515
- Share
Why the hell did the dodgy LibDems go ahead with this scheme? Kerchinnnng.
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 15:37 Is there a sinking fund for the toxic waste dump school as was demanded for housing on this sister contaminated site? No, apparently not and it is vexatious to raise the matter.
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1514
- Share
The Council knew all along about the contamination but tried to pretend it wasn’t there
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 15:09 
A sister site
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1513
- Share
They did better contamination investigations 30 yrs ago than the corrupt LibDems did for a primary school
Vale View School Posted on Sun, March 08, 2015 15:01The warehousing at the Bredbury former Jackson’s Brickyards, where
they did more investigations 30 years ago than they did for this school in 2006,
is not even directly over the old tipped waste – the new school is directly over
the old tip.
The Bredbury sister site investigations – on a strict grid pattern and quite a lot of them – unlike the toxic waste dump school site contamination investigations.
In the early 1980s on a sister Jackson’s Brickyards site opened in
1922, like the Hacourt Street site, with the same layout and planning and
tipping history, they did more contamination investigations on a regular grid
pattern for just warehouses than they did in 2006 for this 550 pupil primary
school. The 1982 warehouses were not going directly over the old tip. This
school is. Why would the safety standards be better 30 years ago than
now?
- Comments(0) https://blogging.sheilaoliver.org/?p=1512
- Share
