The proposed works clash with the
location of an ENWL Sub-Station. The
boundary fencing & arcing distances is
the issue.
Changing design
requirements
Increased design and
construction costs
The proposed works clash with the
location of an ENWL Sub-Station. The
boundary fencing & arcing distances is
the issue.
Changing design
requirements
Increased design and
construction costs
The proposed works clash with the
location of an ENWL Sub-Station.
The boundary fencing & arcing distances is
the issue.
Changing design
requirements
Increased design and
construction costs
Only the incompetent LibDems could bring that about
The ex aircraft landing light that will be
located in the new central reserve of the
proposed works has to be lowered
every week for maintenance checks.
This will require traffic management, the
provision of which Manchester Airport
may object to.
Changing design
requirements
Increased design and
construction costs
Additional NR track possessions
required for construction/additional cost
to NR possessions. Bridge 14 and 15
SMBC issues still so separate risk
required.
Design phase preparation
works and consultation
activities
Increase in SMBC
payment to NR
Nesting birds delaying the start of the
works
Construction start date being
driven by the statutory
process.
Programme delay and
additional cost incurred
Construction costs arising from
unforeseen live utilities
Design phase preparation
works and consultation
activities
Increase cost as
Compensation Event
under the contract
Statutory Undertaker diversions cost
underestimated
Design phase preparation
works and consultation
activities
Increased diversion costs Statutory
Undertakers
Again, money is tight. Who will pay for this LibDem vanity project?
“Increased Thickness of thin Surfacing
required along the length of the
scheme.
Design phase preparation
works and consultation
activities
Scheme delayed and
budgets are compromised”
The bent Stockport LibDems are doing this on a shoestring. Who is going to pay cost overruns? I have been asking this all along.