Stockport Council News

SEMMMS Final Report 2001

4.14 The core objectives are closely related to those in the GMLTP. In using these as a starting point there was an explicit recognition that this points the strategy towards a particular type of solution, in that they promote:

public transport use; and

the concentration of development at existing established centres, brownfield sites and a number of particular priority locations as opposed to expansion on green-field sites located on the urban fringe and around major road junctions.

From Final SEMMMS Report 2001

3.56 The findings of the questionnaire analysis supported and were consistent with findings from the series of focus group undertaken in Phase 1 and the consultation with the Steering Group and Wider Reference Group. This created confidence in the study process. The public response to the questionnaire was much higher than anticipated, showing the importance of transport issues in South East Manchester.

Unlike the dodgy Stockport LibDems’ one which cost three quarters of a million pounds.

SEMMMS Final Report 2001

3.55 Congestion was seen as the biggest transport problem in South East Manchester, but the questionnaire response showed a recognition that building new roads alone would not solve the transport problems. Maintaining and making better use of the existing road network received strong support. The support for Metrolink extensions indicated a willingness pay for high quality reliable public transport, but existing public transport provision was seen to give poor value for money. Workplace parking charges or road user charging in isolation were not popular as solutions.

SEMMMS Final Report 2001

“3.51 Generally, the measures can be described as either ”carrots‘ or ”sticks‘ . Not surprisingly, the ”carrot‘ measures proved to be the most popular. The measure with most support was better maintenance of roads and footpaths (46%). The next was extending Metrolink (35%). Better bus services (28%), cheaper bus and rail fares (28%), building new roads (26%), and increasing the capacity of existing roads (21%) were also popular measures. It is notable that building new roads received a high response, but other items were more favoured.”

SEMMMS Final Report 2001 – Page 39 – Weighted % sample of responses of what people in Greater Manchester actually wanted, as opposed to what we are getting.

Better maintenance of roads, pavements and footpaths – 46%

Extending Metrolink 35%

Better bus services – 28%

Cheaper bus and rail fares – 28%

Building new roads – 26%

Improving existing roads to increase their capacity – 21%

Traffic calming in residential areas – 14%

Better rail services – 12%

Better facilities for cyclists – 11%

Better facilities for pedestrians – 9″

More ”park and ride” facilities – 8%

Better information for bus and rail travellers – 8%

More school buses – 6%

Charging for using congested roads and

spending the money on transport – 6%

More bus lanes and bus priority routes – 6%

Better information on current traffic conditions – 3%

Charging for parking at work and spending the money on transport – 3%

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jul/10/uk-cities-breach-eu-pollution-limits-2030?view=desktop

So, why do we need the road?

SEMMMS Final Report 2001

“8.75 The construction of the Metrolink extension to the Airport, forms part of the Metrolink Single Contract for which Government support has been committed. GMPTE has commenced a tender process for the delivery of the project. The current timetable indicates that a contract will be signed in Spring 2003. During the implementation plan period GMPTE intends to submit a Transport & Works Act Order application for the further extension of Metrolink from Hough End on the Airport extension to Stockport Bus Station.”