Stockport Council News

Have a look at all the officials who were made fully aware of what Goddard was doing to Mr Parnell. He died in 2013 – I told them back in 2009 and before that. They instigated the abuse of him or allowed that abuse to continue until his death. He was even hounded by Stockport Council when they knew he was terminally ill in Intensive Care.

Jennifer Williams, Manchester Evening News reporter, kindly covered his 3 day Crown Court Appeal and the late Gerald Price of UKIP was very concerned about the horrendous treatment of this sick, innocent, gentle man.

Mr Parnell was acquitted of the ludicrous assault with a sneeze with intent to cause harm in a 3 day £10,000 per day Crown Court hearing.

This was the CCTV of the alleged assault – absolutely nothing took place at all. When this was shown at appeal the case was thrown out. The Police, CPS, the dodgy senior council officers must have looked at this CCTV before Mr Parnell was imprisoned for the alleged assault. Freemasonry at work in Stockport?

http://www.sheilaoliver.org/smbc-cctv-evidence.html

And another one. An Executive Councillor who witnessed Mr Parnell standing up at meeting after meeting begging for his legal entitlement to counselling help for his lovely, troubled daughters adopted by Stockport Council. Councillor David White did nothing to help Mr Parnell RIP.

http://www.sheilaoliver.org/begging-stockport-council-for-help.html

Below is my email exchange with a now thrown out LibDem Councillor. She never did exert any effort to help him – the LibDems never did.

How can these questions from the excellent Mr Dransfield also be “vexatious” along with my questions pertaining to multi million pound fraud? LibDems eh, what’re they like?

From: FOI Officer
Date:
16 July 2013 11:30:42 BST

Cc:
FOI Officer
Subject:
FW: Valve View School Outstanding Issues – FOI 7420 –
Response
Dear
Mr Dransfield,

I
am writing in response to your request for information (ref FOI
7420).

This
request for information has been refused under Section 14(1) of the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 as it has been deemed vexatious.

Although
the term vexatious is not defined by the legislation, I have taken this decision
considering the themes as provided by the Upper Tribunal case of Information
Commissioner v Devon CC and Dransfield [2012] UKUT 440
(ACC).

Stockport
Council has received numerous requests for information from you since June 2011.
On the whole, these requests have related to various building regulations and/or
safety inspections primarily about Vale View Primary School in North
Reddish.

On
9th April 2013 I provided you with a refusal notice explaining why the decision
had been taken to refuse your (at the time) outstanding FOIA requests.

Although
the FOIA provides a significant right to request information, this right is not
overriding. More importantly, this right does not extend to providing a channel
for unauthorised investigations into the legality of building constructions by
members of the public.

To
continue to attempt to use the Act in this way is considered to be vexatious in
the sense of it being a manifestly unjustified, inappropriate or improper use of
FOIA.

As
this request appears to be continuing this theme Stockport Council has taken the
decision to refuse this request for information under Section 14(1) of the FOIA.

As
this request has been refused, there is no provision for an internal review to
be conducted by the Council.

If
you are unhappy with this response, you are entitled to complain to the
Information Commissioner. I understand that you have already raised this to the
ICO under their reference
FS50493287.
The Council are not
prepared to enter into any further discussion on this matter pending the outcome
of the ICO’s investigation.

Yours sincerely,

Simon
Oldfield

Freedom
of Information/ Data Protection Officer & RIPA
Coordinator

Stockport
Council
Town Hall
Stockport
SK1 3XE

Tel:
0161 474 4048
Fax: 0161 474 4006
http://www.stockport.gov.uk

Anwar Majothi has no recollection eh. Mr Majothi tells porkies.

Ban any discussion, FOI questions or council meeting questions on a subject year after year then say it is too late to comment. Dodgy Stockport Council.

Dodgy Stockport Council put the names, addresses and signatures of huge numbers of council taxpayers up on the Council website. At a full council meeting on a Thursday evening this was drawn to the attention of the Leader, all the Executive Councillors, all the senior council officers present, and all the other councillors. No action was taken to remove this damaging information until the following Monday when those affected complained to the police and the Information Commissioner.

Over that weekend Mr Parnell was arrested three times for trying to get his name, address and signature (and mine) down from the Council website (please see the video link below)

http://www.sheilaoliver.org/arrested-for-trying-to-report-a-data-protection-offence.html

You can see from the Word document above from Stockport Council’s Freedom of Information Officer that they didn’t even hold any sort of meeting to discuss this serious breach of the Data Protection Act.

This is a truly horrendous council and at that time the Monitoring Officer was the dreadful Barry Khan.