So by May 2006 the Council is admitting the scheme is £2.40 million over the available funding.
Yours
Mrs Sheila Oliver
Stockport’s Freedom of Information Campaigner
Vicki Bates maintained I was being vexatious for raising this matter. Should she still be in post? In October 2005 the new school was to have cost 5.5 million pounds. By 15th May 2006 it was 2.4 million pounds over budget. They shut me up by claiming my questions were vexatious. They weren’t – they were uncovering fraud and incompetence.
The Council stated it was cheaper to use the Harcourt Street site than the Fir Tree site. Please may I see the documentary evidence of this fact from the very start of this process. There must surely be documentary evidence as this claim was made by the Council.
At the Fir Tree site there would be no traffic regulation orders/work – £130,000, no CPO costs £70,000, no drainage costs – £75,000, no Services to install – £231,000, no contamination costs – goodness knows how many millions that could be, no Sport England costs – £600,000, no village green costs, no footpath diversion inquiry costs, no outreach costs.
As I understand it the Council has a legal duty to consider alternatives which might present better value to the Council taxpayer. Please provide evidence that a proper evaluation of the costs of putting the school on the Fir Tree site have been carried out.
I visited Harcourt St area and Fir Road area on Wednesday 13th August 2008 to observe the road layout and general appearances. The timing was between 13.30 and 14.30. The weather was fine and sunny. The schools were on holiday.
Observations
1 Harcourt St as such is a series of artificially blocked off sections and it is impossible to follow in one go the full length of the road. I saw one access point to the green area which is presumed to be the proposed school. It is a pleasant enough road with off road parking for some houses and with adjacent Sts running to Gorton Road being terraced houses with limited parking. I don’t know what part if any Harcourt St will actually be used to access the school. If it is then the current layout will make for a very congested area with confused access points.
2 I suspect the main access to the school will be in the Longford Rd, Mill Lane and Windmill Lane one way system. All these streets were very busy even at the time I visited. The right turn from Mill Lane to Windmill Lane, which I did, is almost impossible and very dangerous because of limited visibility.
Longford St is a mainly terraced, one way street from Gorton Rd with limited residential parking. I can’t imagine residents being too happy with a greater influx of traffic. Probably everything going to the school would come down either this street or Windmill Lane.
Windmill Lane is full of bends, narrow in parts, unsuitable for a lot more parking and I would imagine that School buses would find it tricky to negotiate. As I say the turn into Mill Lane and from Mill Lane into Windmill Lane is very dodgy.
Mill Lane is a dead end leading from Gorton Road into which it feeds as a one way st and as a two way narrow lane from its’ junction with Longford St and Windmill Lane. Basically it is a country lane with some very nice housing developments providing quite a bit of traffic. At its’ dead end it appears to be a walking access to open ground.
I am guessing this is where the proposed turning circle is to be put. Nothing is ever impossible and certainly walkers who visit would equally find it useful to park their cars in such an area. However at the least it would destroy that part of a very nice quiet, narrow country lane and at worst the narrow width of the lane would make it extremely difficult for buses to safely travel. Also if buses are using the turning circle how will the cars of parents turn round, the road is too narrow for that.
Of all the streets, to my mind Mill Lane presented the greater problems.
SHEILA I THINK ROADS ARE CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO THEIR WIDTH AND THIS WILL DETERMINE HOW AND BY WHAT THEY CAN BE USED!!!.
For instance Emergency vehicles (fire engines and ambulances) require a certain access width AND ESPECIALLY TO THE LARGEST SCHOOL IN STOCKPORT.
3 I took the opportunity to visit the Fir Road School. What a contrast. The road access is excellent. I know there is a reservoir behind but would this restrict its’ expansion? It was much more pleasant to drive there than the difficult narrow and congested area around Harcourt St
4 Someone wrote in the Express that the toffs in Harcourt St were bullying the much poorer people around Fir Road. I am no expert in evaluating house prices. Whilst there are some very nice houses especially in Mill Lane the houses around Fir Road and Longford Rd West seemed actually better and in no way did it appear a poor area compared to the streets between Gorton Rd and Harcourt St.
Conclusion
I believe the evidence shows there is a traffic problem especially around Mill Lane. Fir Rd appears to have much better access with easier parking and bus access.
Recommendations
1 I think you should get a photograph/video record of the 2 areas.
2 You should obtain from Traffic Services the various width classifications of streets along with any recommendations of limits of traffic usage, parking etc.
Part of this should be any considerations that need to be made for Emergency Plans ( what happens if the school sets on fire)
3 Someone should measure the pavement widths, and road widths of Harcourt, Windmill, Longford Rd, Mill Lane, Longford Rd West and Browning Rd.
Hope this helps and please come back if something is not clear enough.
LOL
XXXX
ps Have you seen Goddard has lost the Town Centre Development. The bungs can’t have been big enough.
On 10 Aug 2008, at 08:55, sheilaoliver wrote:
Sir
Attached is a Google Earth map which explains some of the Harcourt Street traffic problems.
Those houses on the two estates within the red lines can only leave via very narrow Mill Lane. Two days before the planning decision meeting the Head of Traffic decided the traffic proposals for the school were unworkable and introduced the turning circle at the top of Mill Lane. So, in the morning when traffic is leaving those houses, and most have two or even four cars, then parents will be doing U-turns in front of them into the turning circle where the council says they can park and walk their children up to the school and the council also says they can’t park, so presumably they will leave their young children to walk up the dangerous lane and negotiate the unworkable school entrance on their own.
At the top of Mill Lane is Windmill Lane, a main road artery and when the M60 floods, which it does a lot, traffic leaves the motorway to use Windmill Lane to escape it.
Never mind the contamination issues, I and everyone else who lives there thinks this proposal is complete madness and very dangerous for children.
What do you think? I respect your advice. Do you think a turning circle on a narrow, dangerous lane in those circumstance is workable. I know you will tell me the truth – warts and all. Am I exaggerating the problem?
“Mr Philip Duncan Wright is British and was born in 1953. The first directorship we have on file for him was in 1996 at Common Purpose International. His newest directorship is with Hilden Vineyard LLP. The company was established 25 Sep 2014. Philip has held 13 directorships, 9 of which are currently active, and 4 are no longer active.”
“Mr Richard Denis Paul Charkin was born in 1949 and the first directorship we have on file was in 1991 at Formpart (No. 17) Limited. His most recent directorship is with Hart Publishing Ltd. where he hold the position of “Publisher”. This company has been around since 24 Jan 1997. In total, Richard has held 95 directorships, 13 of which are current, and 82 are no longer active.”
“Common Purpose Global Customised Limited was incorporated on 17 Jul 2013 and is located in London. The company’s status is listed as “Active” and it currently has 3 directors. It was founded by Mr Guy Winearls Stobart, Mr Philip Duncan Wright. Common Purpose Global Customised Limited does not have any subsidiaries.”
“The Common Purpose Charitable Trust was registered on 29 Jun 1993 with its registered office in London. The business has a status listed as “Active” and it currently has 13 directors. It was founded by Dr Richard David Field, Mr Richard Worsley, Sir Gerrard Jude Robinson. The business currently employs 50-99 people. They have one subsidiary, Common Purpose Global Customised Limited.”