LibDem
planning corruption, with a large proportion of the miscreants coming from the
Hazel Grove constituency – financial
abuses.
There is no functioning fraud and financial irregularities policy at Stockport. I have tried to report this for a decade, but keep being stopped by Vicki Bates, Monitoring Officer at Stockport Council, Michelle Dodds, Deputy Monitoring Officer, other senior council officers and councillors of the cabinet.
This is an explanation of the rise in the cost of the toxic
waste dump school, obtained after talking to a now dead Executive Councillor
for Finance, Cllr Carter, in the town hall car park, as I was not allowed to
question him in meetings.
As you will see from sheet 2, a figure of £1450m2 was adopted
within the cost plan.
As you will see from sheet 1 for the increased floor area from
2600m2 to 3185m2 a cost of £1.050 million is given –
3185 -2600 = 585m2 x £1450 = £848,250 and not £1.050 million.
Surely, it is in no way
“vexatious” to question a financial irregularity of £207,750. But it is at Stockport firstly under the
LibDems and now still under Labour.
In addition, changing areas Sport England – £280,000 – additional
167m2. Firstly, 167m2 x £1450 – £242,
150 and not £280,000. Secondly, as far
as I am aware there is didley squat there on the site and, of course, I am not
allowed to check whether these are hidden inside the school as that would be
“vexatious”.
There is no football pitch at the school site – another £75k
abnormality Michelle Dodds and others won’t allow me to question.
I asked then LibDem leader of the Council Goddard, now Lord
Goddard, chum of notorious gangsters and the person who had sick, innocent Mr
Parnell imprisoned. I have submitted the
evidence countless times as I have done to you. This was his response:
Stockport Council Monitoring Officer Vicki Bates and her deputy Michelle Dodds claim it is “vexatious” to question these multi £m financial irregularities. Are these women fit people to hold public office?
The Stockport Council assistant monitoring officer Michelle
Dodds and Vicki Bates, Strategic Head of Service
& Monitoring Officer (Legal, Democratic Governance and
Estate and Asset Management), say I am vexatious to have ever raised this
issue. Ms Dodds and Ms Bates obviously
care nothing for children’s safety.
The Stockport then-entirely LibDem Executive decided
to build the new 500 pupil, still gassing toxic waste dump school at this
location where traffic was already horrendous:
Most of the cars from the houses within the red lines on the photo below, which have to exit their housing estate along narrow Mill Lane past the new, still gassing toxic waste dump primary school, were ignored at the planning meeting. What about the traffic from all these houses I asked and asked? Don’t be vexatious they replied, and they still do – Ms Dodds and Ms Bates, Stockport Council panjandrums.
Within weeks of the new school opening the police had complained about the dangerous traffic situation, which I had previously warned the Council about:
The school was issuing
letters to parents and residents about the dangerous traffic situation, but
still my questions on the subject were and still are “vexatious”.
It would be bad enough that Ms Dodds and Ms
Bates, Monitoring Officers, don’t care about children’s safety enough to allow
questions to be asked about the traffic situation, but my young son died in a
traffic accident aged just 16. For these
women to call a mother who lost her child in a traffic accident “vexatious” for
correctly identifying the dangers to primary school children is so offensive to
me as to be off the scale.
The ghastly and some very dodgy Stockport LibDem Councillors used to send colour photos of themselves with good news stories to over 120,000 homes in Stockport six times a year. Fortunately, that no longer happens
Dear Mrs Oliver, I am writing in response to your request for information below (ref 1922). The total budget allocated is £147,538. If you are unhappy with the way we have handled your request you are entitled to ask for an internal review. Any internal review will be carried out by a senior member of staff who was not involved with your original request. To ask for an internal review, contact foi.officer@stockport.gov.uk in the first instance. If you are unhappy with the outcome of any internal review, you are entitled to complain to the Information Commissioner. To do so, contact: Information Commissioner’s Office Wycliffe House Water Lane Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF www.ico.gov.uk 01625 545 745 Yours sincerely, Claire Naven Claire Naven Data Protection & Freedom of Information Officer Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
Hunter – October 2005 £3,000 paid to regional partyStunell – November 2005 £4,000 paid to North West LibDemsMark Hunter £2,544.91 to Anon – January 2006Stunell – July 2006 £4,000 to regional partyStunell April 2006 £5,000 paid to the Liberal DemocratsHunter – April 2006- 2007 £4,000 paid to the LibDemsStunell – August 2006 £4,000 paid to North West LibDemsMark Hunter – £4,000 paid to North West LibDems October 2007All redacted.September 2007 £4,000 paid to regional party
Stockport LibDem councillors Lisa Smart and Angela Clark want to destroy the lovely Goyt Valley with an extension to their disastrous A6 MARR bypass, and Smart has the damned cheek to produce an election leaflet like the one above. She is such a hypocrite.
“Having fun on the internet The Internet is a cool place to learn new things, play games and connect with friends and family. Billions of people around the world use the Internet just like you!”
“How to check your child’s credit report The presence of one could signal identity theft”
https://thebestvpn.com/vpn-vs-proxy/
“VPNs and proxy services offer some similar features, but with major differences in versatility and security. VPNs vs Proxy will explain these differences and help you make the right choice for your needs.”
Mr Parnell only asked for counselling for his lovely, adopted daughters who had had a terrible time with their birth parents.
The Serious Case reviews of these two terrible incidents meant that Stockport Council in future agreed to help parents who came to them asking for assistance with children who had problems. Not what they did for sick, innocent Mr Parnell or his lovely family.
They framed and falsely imprisoned him for alleged assault with a sneeze, which CCTV they had showed hadn’t happened, and they refused to allow it to be shown at his trial – evidence exonerating him completely.
