Blog Image

Stockport Council News

They didn’t bother to investigate under the football pitch, so have not complied with BS 10175

Vale View School Posted on Wed, May 08, 2013 04:31

This document can be more clearly viewed at – http://www.sheilaoliver.org/contamination.html

“The decision not to disturb the pitch was a verbal one….”

So, they tried to get away with not bothering to investigate a very large part of what they knew was a seriously contaminated site when they knew a primary school was to be going there. When I pointed out to LibDem Stockport Council they had failed to investigate properly they called me a liar and vexatious – and they still do. The site should have been investigated on a strict grid pattern under BS 10175. They repeatedly claimed in writing to have complied with this.



Gas boreholes deliberately sunk not over the actual old tip

Vale View School Posted on Wed, May 08, 2013 04:23

We have seen the location of the old tip and the location of the school are one and the same. We have seen previously that no contamination trial pits were dug where the school was going (deliberately so no contamination would be found).

We now see that the gas boreholes have been sunk around the periphery of the old tip and not in a strict grid pattern as should have been the case if they had complied with BS 10175.

These documents can be more clearly viewed at – http://www.sheilaoliver.org/contamination.html

Boreholes 1/05, 2/05, 3/05, 4/05 (no well – I don’t know what that means and apparently it is vexatious of me to have asked),5/05, 6/05, 7/05, 8/05, 9/05 and 10/05 testing for gas.

All contamination trial pits dug nowhere near where the school was going. “Existing borehole” is the one totally inadequate contamination investigation they tried to get away with and trial pit 5/05 wasn’t even dug because they didn’t own the land.



The old tip – just where the school was put

Vale View School Posted on Wed, May 08, 2013 04:11

The ///////// areas marked on this old map are where the old tip was. Slap, bang underneath the new 550 pupil and 78 babies nursery. In the late 1800s a brickyard was on the site with a brick kiln. Claypits were dug out to obtain clay for the bricks. Brickmaking was continued up until the 1950s and then the clay pits were filled in with rubbish. There was no record kept at that time of what was tipped as tipping wasn’t regulated. Some of the contamination found in the paltry four contamination pits they actually bothered to dig at the far end of the site to where the school was going showed Benzopyrene, which is a carcinogenic substance probably from the old brick kilns.



Excellent local MP even mentions the contamination on the site in Parliament

Vale View School Posted on Wed, May 08, 2013 04:02

These documents can be more clearly read at – http://www.sheilaoliver.org/contamination.html

The matter was even mentioned in Parliament by the excellent local MP, Andrew Gwynne. No-one at the Council can claim ignorance of the facts.



The school was going at the top of the site – all the contamination trial pits were dug at the bottom.

Vale View School Posted on Wed, May 08, 2013 03:50

This document can be more clearly read at – http://www.sheilaoliver.org/contamination.html

All the contamination trial pits were dug at the bottom of this site – the school was going at the top. Why not dig any contamination pits where the school was going? Because they would have found contamination.

Trial pits 0/05, 2/05, 3/05 and 4/05