Stockport Council News

The vile Stunell never lifted a finger to help Mr Parnell. The only thing he did was to try to isolate him from me.

Email sent – 13 September 2009 18:26

I am well used to your hypocritical ways over the Goyt Valley and building in flood plains – pretending you are green and writing to the Environment Agency on flooding issue, but if Mr. Parnell or his family commit suicide over this terrible treatment he is getting, I shall hound you with your pontificating over the wrong people being in prison.

Do something for once.

Mrs Oliver

Never, ever vote LibDem. All the LibDem Executive Councillors knew what was being done to him.

Email sent – 23 July 2010 15:58
Dear All (CPS, FOI Officer

…….

Mr Parnell faces five years in jail for each of the five charges against him. You people must feel very proud.

Yours

Sheila

Email sent – 23 July 2010 06:01
Dear Stockport CPS

I enclose authority from Mr Parnell.

Please send me all details you have on him. Should you require a £10 fee I am more than happy to supply it. Please also include any communication between Stockport CPS and Stockport Council.

I shall submit any damning evidence I find to the Treasury and I always go to the top. I am certainly not going to pay £10,000 per day for his trial in November and I think the CPS will have to pay damages to him, so the longer this goes on the more you will have to pay.

Please let me know also the names of the insurers of the CPS if any. They won’t have to cover reckless or illegal behaviour, and I want to report to them to what has gone on. There is no reason they (the taxpayer) should fund any compensation, that will be down to the CPS individuals themselves, I presume, if they have acted recklessly or outside the law.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours

Sheila Oliver

Email sent – 18 May 2011 21:41

Dear Stockport Crown Prosecution Service

Having read the Code for Crown Prosecutors, I am at a loss to understand how Mr Parnell’s case ever came to court. I had to pay; I am a bit cross. Stockport CPS had a legal obligation to abide by this code. I suggest you stop bringing these malicious prosecutions.

Section 3.3 states that the prosecutors have to, where possible, rectify the evidential weaknesses. The CCTV shown in court clearly showed there was no offence. If the evidence does not support the case, then the case should be stopped. When the CPS reviewed the CCTV footage of the alleged assault with a sneeze and there was no sneeze, the case should have been stopped. If the case relied on witness statements and these weren’t sufficient, the case should be dropped. The Council witnesses lied in court. It was obvious the whole case was a fabrication from the outset.

Each case is subject to the full code test, which consists of the evidential stage and the public interest stage. Section 4.5 shows the prosecutors must have sufficient evidence to ensure a conviction against a defendant at this stage. The prosecution has to examine the defence case . If a case does not pass the evidential stage, then it should not continue. There was no evidence of any sneeze on the CCTV and may I say at this stage what an utterly stupid charge this was anyway!

Section 4.7 subsection c – regarding the suspect being seen as a bad character. The evidence needs to be reliable. Mr Parnell in all his life had never, ever been in trouble before, apart from his dealings with this, in my experience, corrupt council. Does any evidence go against the evidence of the witnesses? The CCTV showed it to be a lie.

When prosecuting a suspect it has to be considered whether it is in the public interest to prosecute. And it was in my interests to spend vast sums of money on this case – how exactly?

It has to be considered whether the witnesses could have taken a dislike to the accused and fabricated evidence against them. That would appear to have been the case here, and may I mention at this juncture that the court accepted evidence of and the witnessed themselves admitted to such statements as – I will kick your f*cking head in. Nice words indeed from employees of Stockport Council.

I respectfully suggest that no further sham prosecutions are brought against Mr. Parnell. Mercifully and belatedly the police have stopped arresting him. If you prosecute him again (unless he commits a genuine crime, which is unlikely) believe me I will have you all for that. You can’t bring a case if you know the witnesses to be unreliable. You are now fully aware that witnesses from Stockport Council are unreliable.

Shot across the bows there.

Sheila

Email sent – 22 July 2010 20:04

Dear Stockport Crown Prosecution Service

As you will, no doubt, know the Treasury is trying to decimate the CPS and close down magistrates courts by the dozen.

The CPS is countering by claiming what a vital job it does. I have today sent evidence to the Treasury of what the CPS Stockport has got up to regarding Mr Parnell, who has been to court three or is it four times in the last few months with no evidence produced at all by the CPS. He is now facing a 3 day jury trial in November at a cost of £10,000 per day. The actions of CPS prostecutor Mr Eddie Cole may not stand up to close scrutiny by Treasury officials keen to slash and burn. I hope you pass this on to Mr Cole. I am sure his colleagues will be a little annoyed that he has given the Treasury such ammunition to use against the CPS. I shall cc what I send to Keir Starmer too.

With very warmest best wishes

Sheila

I question Ms Hramiak’s judgement; I really do.

Email sent – 05 October 2009 19:4
Dear Ms Hramiak

Thank you for your reply. I have seen the CCTV footage. How could it not have covered the scene of the incident? It was in the entrance to Stopford House, where Sam Tyler jumped to his death in Life on Mars, and which of us dealing with Stockport Council has not felt like doing that?

Mr Parnell was convicted after the Court heard evidence from witnesses from Stockport Council who, as I understand it, gave contradictory evidence and both were allowed to go to the lavatory at the same time.

Kind regards

Mrs Oliver

They added to he torture of Mr Parnell by having court cases hanging over him and his family every Christmas, often dropped on the day of the hearing.

Email sent – 13 October 2009 06:16

Dear Cheryl Hramiak

Please may I make a request under the FOIA to see all handwritten notes of telephone conversations, minutes of meetings, handwritten notes of meetings, emails, memos, letters or any other written evidence regarding the CPS’s decision to further delay Mr. Parnell’s hearing until January 2010. Mr Parnell will give his consent.

Yours

Mrs Oliver

Stockport’s Freedom of Information, Environmental and Human Rights Campaigner

c.c. by post to

Keir Starmer QC

Director of Public Prosecutions

CPS

50 Ludgate Hill

London

EC4M 7EX

Email sent – 05 October 2009 19:37

Dear Cheryl Hramiak

Thank you for your response. Having seen the ASBO document myself, it appears to me (and I speak merely as a typist) to be a document with no legal standing. It doesn’t identify the legislation under which the CRASBO is being made. I believe it should have Mr. Parnell’s signature on it. You should be able to see at a glance if it is a legal document or not. If it isn’t, then he should never have been arrested for breaching what appears to me to be a document with no legal standing. He has been arrested again today. I don’t know what for – still breathing maybe. I shall cc this to the local press and his less than helpful MP, who pontificates pointlessly in the press about the wrong people being in prison.

I don’t think we should wait till the end of November to see if the CRASBO has legal credibility. Mr Parnell might not be alive then. He is a very sick man.

Yours

Mrs Oliver