The corrupt Stockport LibDems knew there had been no assault with a sneeze. They had the CCTV of the incident which they refused to allow at the trial of Mr Parnell RIP:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA34fyU1eds
Crown Court Appeal
Manchester Crown Court
Minshull Street
Manchester
Appeal against conviction contrary to
Section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Common assault by sneezing
Innocent by plea as to the allegation
Case appealed in the interest of
justice
As to being disputed in not proved
beyond reasonable doubt to all submitted evidence
R v PARNELL
contrary to
Section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Common assault by sneezing
10th July 2009
Stockport Magistrates
Court
Edward Street
Stockport
I Michael Stewart Parnell appeal the
decision made against me to the allegation of common assault by sneezing with
intention to spread a cold to another
As contrary to section 39 criminal
Justice Act 1988
The reason for this Appeal is in the
interest of Justice and to preserve that right and for the Justice system not
to be abused by those that divert the course of fair justice
In this appeal I will show that an
injustice has been done either by or toward myself from others with their
intent to harm
My main reason of this Appeal is
I am innocent of all allegations made
against me and I will stay true to Justice and uphold the Queens
peace with honour
I pride myself that I respect the law
and will stay strong to that and not commit any offences against any person
How do I intend to show I am innocent
well firstly I give my word
I Michael Stewart Parnell
Do solemnly swear that I tell the
truth to my oath towards myself that I will always be truly honest in that
which I say and do
I Michael Stewart Parnell have not sneezed
on or towards any person and have not in any way intentionally or recklessly
sneezed or blown my nose on any person to cause them any harm alarm concerns or
distress
I have always conducted myself in
ways that respects all people politely and with dignity I am courteous towards
all other peoples needs and if I can will always help out and I receive
gratification from their thanks as my rewards people respect me for what I do
this is what I valve as a good quality
I pride myself of being of good character
that is approved by others and my life has been served to that of helping
others which I do enjoy and get my
rewards by doing
Why are allegations made against me
I believe there are those whose own
wrongdoing puts them to accountability
and their diversions are in their attempts the ways to discredit the way
in which I pursue dealing with those issues
Many people and also police officers
have commented that I have conducted myself exemplary and I am the most peaceful protester they
have ever come across and they complement me on how I behave
The issues with the other parties are
statutory in duty and in their failings not to deal with those issues they have
resorted to criminal acts in their attempts to divert the courts from their
true purpose as to enforce the laws and regulations in the UK
False allegations only serve one
purpose they damage hurt those they are directed towards to discredit our
freedom of rights
In this appeal what are the false
allegation disputed and by who were they fabricated and how do I prove they
acted maliciously
The allegation of the sneeze with the
intension to spread a cold that which was brought about after the failing that
previous allegations failed to have me moved away on that day because I was not
committing any crime allegations must be fabricated if the one making the
allegations knows of a crime before it
is apparent and suggests thats what will happen before it does
Allegation of a sneeze was made by
the two security guards now known to me as Mr Francis Craughwell
Mr Stephen Duggan
The false allegations are made to the police by that
which is now written in the security guards witness statements and also the MP3
and video recordings that have been gathered to support the detection and
prosecution of crime
How can I say that the allegations
made are false
The sneeze or the exhaling under
force down what is alleged to be my right nostril did not and could or would
have happened by me, if those making these allegations could imagine this would
happen from me then in their minds they are capable of fabricating such an
allegation because the possible outcome might be to serve their satisfaction to
discredit my cause and get rid of me once and for all, and is as stated by the
security guards to something that they are working towards
The security guards disrespect for
the law and their comments on tape stating that should be brought before court
as their bad character along with their other unlawfulness and many attacks on
my person under the pretence that they can get away with it only because they
are part of the big organisation and the one individual cant take on those who
have millions behind them
