Stockport Metropolitan Mr M S Parnell
Borough Council day 15outside
Town Hall Town Hall
Edward Street Main Entrance
Stockport Edward Street
SK1 3XE Stockport
To Councillor David Goddard
Date 6th July 2007
Dear sir
Can you arrange for myself to see you so we can talk
Yours sincerely
Stockport Metropolitan Mr M S Parnell
Borough Council day 15 outside
Town Hall Town Hall
Edward Street Main Entrance
Stockport Edward Street
SK1 3XE Stockport
To chief executive Mr John Schultz
Date 6th July 2007
Dear sir
Can you arrange for myself to see you so we can talk
Yours sincerely
Mr Parnell was trying to raise all these issues with the CPS, but they refused to listen to him.
Dear Mrs Oliver
Further to your letter of 6th October 2009 and e-mails of 29th September 2009, 5th October 2009 and 13th October 2009.
I have referred your request for Freedom of Information to the relevant unit and you will hear from them in due course.
Mr Parnell has Defence Solicitors who are representing him in these proceedings and any request for further information in relation to the Criminal Anti-Social Behaviour Order or the evidence and process of prosecution in the case should be directed to them so that they can raise these issues on Mr Parnell’s behalf.
Yours sincerely
Cheryl Hramiak
Branch Crown Prosecutor
Salford/Stockport/Trafford Branch
Dear Mrs Oliver
Further to your e-mail of the 28th September 2009, sent at 19.22, and as covered in earlier e-mails, the Magistrates’ Court imposed the criminal anti-social behaviour order not that the Crown Prosecution Service. The legality of such an order is to be considered at the appeal hearing.
My lawyers and caseworkers are informed that they must not discuss cases openly in court in the presence of members of the public.
Yours sincerely
Cheryl Hramiak
Branch Crown Prosecutor
Salford/Stockport/Trafford Branch
Dear Mrs Oliver
Further to your e-mail of 28th September 2009, I note the contents. The original CCTV did not cover the scene of the incident. Mr Parnell was convicted after the Court heard evidence from the witnesses involved in this incident.
Yours sincerely
Cheryl Hramiak
Branch Crown Prosecutor
Salford/Stockport/Trafford Branch
“to ensure that evidential tests are met” maybe they should have allowed the CCTV exonerating him to have been show in court – just a thought.
Dear Mrs Oliver
Further to your e-mail of the 29th September 2009 the subject of the legality of the ASBO and the evidence which was put before the Court, which led to Mr Parnell’s conviction, will be considered by the Crown Court as part of Mr Parnell’s appeal.
The Crown Prosecution Service continually review cases against all defendants to ensure that the evidential tests and public interest tests are met. At this stage it is our intention to proceed on the assault charges.
Yours sincerely
Cheryl Hramiak
Branch Crown Prosecutor
Salford/Stockport/Trafford Branch
