Blog Image

Stockport Council News

John Schulz – thank goodness he has gone.

Andrew Webb, CYPD, Anwar Majothi, Barry Khan, Donna Sager, CYPD, Eamonn Boylan, Ged Lucas, LibDem Councillors, Stunell MP, Sue Derbyshire, Town Hall Protester Posted on Sat, June 05, 2021 17:21

Email sent – Sun 30/08/2009 15:39

Anwar Majothi anwar.majothi@stockport.gov.uk; cllr.sue.derbyshire@stockport.gov.uk; Cllr David White cllr.david.white@stockport.gov.uk; Cllr Mark Weldon cllr.mark.weldon@stockport.gov.uk; martin.candler@stockport.gov.uk; Donna Sager donna.sager@stockport.gov.uk; Chief.Constable@gmp.police.uk; Michael Warburton Michael.Warburton@ico.gsi.gov.uk; MICHAEL PARNELL mickysara@btinternet.com; Syd Lloyd syd@sparkling-ice.com; Philip.Farrar@rmpartners.co.uk; barry khan barry.khan@stockport.gov.uk

Dear Mr Schultz

Please see the attached. Again, this young person has been let down by Stockport Council.  I note the Council decided to produce no report on Alison Davies, the Stockport lady who jumped from the Humber Bridge with her 9 year old autistic son, despite criticism of the Council in the Serious Case Review report.  All attempts by me to find out if she was persecuted by this Council for complaining, as Mr. Parnell has been, have been blocked by Donna Sager, Assistant Director of the Children’s and Young People’s Directorate, possibly the person who decided no report was needed on Ms Davies.

We have the probable death of the pensioner due to maintenance not being carried out in 62 council properties due to funds having to be diverted to deal the asbestos in schools issue, which another councillor claimed had been known about for years (court case April 2009). 

It is a testment to Mr. Parnell’s strength of character that he hasn’t himself committed suicide following the 90 times the police were called to him, 12 arrests, one court case dropped on the day of the hearing, one magistrate’s court case in which CCTV evidence was not allowed to be shown for an alleged pre-swine flu sneeze offence, four days in a particularly tough Manchester prison for breaching his CRASBO (criminal asbo) conditions in using the public lavatory at the town hall, for which he was arrested by police who came in a police car with flashing blue lights, so the police were called as an emergency.  Mr Parnell has been asking for help with his troubled adopted daughters for over a decade, he has spent a further  2 years on the town hall steps.  It is a wonder his daughters have not also decided to end their lives, given the extra problems this family has had to endure as a result of the actions of this council (four days in prison and a fine the family can’t afford).  To cap it all the Leader of the Council sent me an apparently gloating email about this decent chap being sent to prison and included confidential court documents. Why is the Council harassing and persecuting this man?

Finally, the decision to build a school, massively overbudget, not big enough for the children who need to attend, no room to hold a sports day, with dangerous traffic arrangements on a still gassing former toxic waste dump extensively dumped from 1954 to 1974 with NO contamination investigation pits dug over the site of the proposed school which is directly over the infilled tip will lead to more deaths.  In contravention of the Council’s fraud and financial irregularity policy, financial anomalies of circa £2.4 million  being brought to the attention of the Council have led to me being branded as a liar, rude, offensive and from September 1st apparently  über-vexatious.  Why is the man in charge of this appalling situation – Andrew Webb – lauded on  prestigious government committees?  Why doesn’t he spend time in Stockport sorting out this horrible mess?

There are more issues which I don’t want to talk to the Council about because the people telling me these things are scared of reprisals.  I shall send the details to the press.  Potentially, there are more suicides as a result of this.

I don’t suppose you will respond – you never do, Mr. Schulz.

Sheila Oliver

Stockport’s Freedom of Information Campaigner



How much public money did the LibDem planks at Stockport waste on Mr Parnell’s persecution?

Andrew Webb, CYPD, Anwar Majothi, Barry Khan, Eamonn Boylan, Ged Lucas, LibDem Councillors, Stunell MP, Sue Derbyshire, Town Hall Protester Posted on Sat, June 05, 2021 17:14

Email sent – Fri 21/08/2009 21:08

Cllr Dave Goddard cllr.dave.goddard@stockport.gov.uk; Cllr David White cllr.david.white@stockport.gov.uk; Cllr Mark Weldon cllr.mark.weldon@stockport.gov.uk; cllr.sue.derbyshire@stockport.gov.uk,MICHAEL PARNELL mickysara@btinternet.com; Anwar Majothi anwar.majothi@stockport.gov.uk; Chief.Constable@gmp.police.uk; John Schultz chief.executive@stockport.gov.uk

Dear Councillors and Officials

Please see the attached.  I just want to say how reassuring it is that  no expense is spared in keeping us all safe from evil villains, like – well – sneezers for instance.

Thank you very much for allowing me to sleep easy in my bed. Your efforts are much appreciated.

With warmest best wishes

Sheila

Stockport’s Freedom of Information Fighter



How much money you need to get justice in the UK.

Andrew Webb, CYPD, Anwar Majothi, Barry Khan, Ged Lucas, LibDem Councillors, Stunell MP, Sue Derbyshire, Town Hall Protester Posted on Sat, June 05, 2021 17:04

Dear Sheila
Thank you greatly for your offer but I have to decline, not that I don’t appreciate it but the loss of well earned money would be a crime to waste it, its not that I decline your help but justice should be free, Pannones in manchester I had consultation with in 2008 and they agreed then without the later issues as now my case would require a judicial review which would demand 85 hours of investigative work at £198 per hour for an under clerk and that I could be required to have securities of £800K and they don’t operate pro-bono,
My belief is justice will come in the easiest way Common Law for common people will come in a common way public disgust in the public interest.

The council won’t be able lawfully to keep suppressing their accountability with them under the spotlight they will become hot around the collar and when they sweat the salts of my case will come out, Media attention is now on our side we can film and record them and even though my past filming is hurtful I look forward to the fun filming them in the future,
Today I received a letter for Stunell wishing my operation went well and that my belief of his appointment of the queens honour he will now have to be seen to work harder not that he can just sit back because of his title, he says he stands ready to assist again if I wish,
He is not a newcomer to being filmed if I do take him at his word my contact and any meeting will be filmed he can no longer hide and if he now fails he could be required to answer to the queen.
I think we will just for a while have to keep chipping at their hard faced skin to get under their guilt, for acknowledgement rather than denial

When they start to fall I will be there to catch them, they will not take the easy way out schults lucas et al I will be after them, if they keep coming after me or wishing to I will stand fast to my rights, justice will remove the blindfold from the lady with the scales and sword so she is clear to see the facts.

Sheila thank you, your offer warms my heart but no the money can not be used to challenge the faceless ones to their gain but no I won’t allow it.

Love and many thanks
Mike

Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange


From: “Sheila Oliver” <sheilaoliver@ntlworld.com>

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:46:54 +0100

To: MICHAEL PARNELL<mickysara@btinternet.com>

Subject: Mike, I want you to go to Pannones

Mike

They do human rights cases and they are not likely to be in the same Masonic Lodge as SMBC officers and councillors which Stockport solicitors might.

If I give you some money would you be able to do that?

Love

Sheila



The worse than useless Stockport Council complaints officer, Anwar Majothi.

Andrew Webb, CYPD, Anwar Majothi, Barry Khan, Eamonn Boylan, Ged Lucas, LibDem Councillors, Stunell MP, Sue Derbyshire, Town Hall Protester Posted on Sat, June 05, 2021 16:52

Dear Sheila
Response to Majorthi reply
Mike

Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange


From: mickysara@btinternet.com

Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:19:44 +0000

To: anwar.majothi@stockport.gov.uk<anwar.majothi@stockport.gov.uk>

ReplyTo: mickysara@btinternet.com

Subject: Re: Assault complaints


Mr Majothi

Re: reply to your email

Thank you for your prompt reply, your response does not grasp the issues that was submitted, your reply does not mention what is the main issue founding the grounds to my complaint Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council’s DUTY OF CARE.

In addressing your reply in the first line you state that “I am afraid that I will not be investigating your complaint further, at this stage.” If this is a correct statement then could you correctly follow procedures and confirm the next course to take if a complainant is not in agreement with your findings (appeal or direction towards the local government ombudsman),

To my submission formally I present my representation, Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council has failed in its Duty of Care to protect me from harm when attending as a service customer at council service counters, the harm suffered is both physical injury and psychological trauma, (with reference to your reply one officer has since left the council, this doesn’t take away the councils liability, to the behaviour causing injury, and that the other officer has been warned in relation to his dealing with myself (M Parnell),
You state ” I therefore see no purpose in investigating your complaint further”, this representation is not a complaint about those officers behaviour but is to Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council’ liability to the injuries and trauma’s caused by the council’s officers while performing their council duties.

In representation to the failing of the Duty of Care, my application is made to an award for damages under Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council’s Public Liability.

Michael Parnell

Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange


From: Anwar Majothi <anwar.majothi@stockport.gov.uk>

Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:14:55 +0000

To: ‘mickysara@btinternet.com'<mickysara@btinternet.com>

Subject: RE: Assault complaints

Dear Mr Parnell,

Thank you for your email.

I am afraid that I will not be investigating your complaint further, at this stage. You previously drew attention to video clips which appeared on a website involving you and two members of Council staff which I was not aware of until quite recently (as you know one
Officer has since left the Council). I have been advised that the remaining Officer has already been warned in relation to his dealings with you during the period relating to when the video footage appears to have been shot. I therefore see no purpose in investigating your complaint further, unless you have further video footage which I would be happy to review. You may recall that I have already asked you for further information, which has thus far not been forthcoming.

Yours sincerely,

Anwar Majothi

Corporate Complaints Manager

Stopford House

Stockport Council

SK1 3XE

Tel: 0161 474 3182

Fax: 0161 474 4006

http://www.stockport.gov.uk

From: mickysara@btinternet.com [mailto:mickysara@btinternet.com]
Sent: 09 June 2013 13:47
To: Anwar Majothi
Subject: Fw: Assault complaints


Mr Majothi

RE: Complaints of assaults that took place on council property, “Duty of Care”

Following correspondence from the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), received on 22/05/2013 i must inform you that I complain that Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council has not complied with its statutory duty of care,

I formally complain that Stockport metropolitan Borough Council has failed in its Duty of Care to protect me as a service requesting customer in the council’s service center stockport from harm (injuries sustained while attending council offices) on more than one occasion with results of injury occurring causing alarm distress and severe ill well-being.

For your further information supplied below please read previous correspondence sent to you (please read fully, skipping over the fact doesn’t represent your previous findings).

As instructed please correspond receipt of the complaint within 5 days, further delays would be open to complaint.

Michael S Parnell.

Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange


From: MICHAEL PARNELL <mickysara@btinternet.com>

Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 12:41:58 +0100 (BST)

To: <Mickysara@btinternet.com>

Subject: Fw: Your Stage 2 complaints



— On Fri, 4/5/12, MICHAEL PARNELL <mickysara@btinternet.com> wrote:
From: MICHAEL PARNELL <mickysara@btinternet.com>
Subject: Fw: Your Stage 2 complaints
To: “anwar.majothi@stockport.gov.uk” <anwar.majothi@stockport.gov.uk>
Date: Friday, 4 May, 2012, 2:54     —– Forwarded Message —–
From: MICHAEL PARNELL <mickysara@btinternet.com>
To:mickysara@btinternet.com” <mickysara@btinternet.com>
Sent: Friday, 4 May 2012, 2:43
Subject: Fw: Your Stage 2 complaints   Dear Anwar Majothi   I write in reply to your Email dated 2nd May 2012 10:54hrs which I opened on the 3rd May 2012 at 16:00hrs.   In rely to your request for the dates and names to progress my complaint to stage 2, the facts for further investigation must be those that would cause no further delay to the same as those said to have been already investigated at stage 1.   So as not to duplicate my complaint, please could you supply to me the dates and names that were investigated by Mr Denis McCarthy at stage 1 which was found by him not to contain any evidence that the security guards had assaulted me or made threats to my life.   There are many assaults on different dates that are required to be submitted separately for investigation and each of those individual complaints justification.   Following our meeting on Monday the 30th April 2012 I forward in this reply submit a further complaint that is one of the many assaults that have been reported to the police, following levies paid to the police service from the council tax I forward the correspondence (below) sent of the assault by coumcil employee’s, the council has a duty for submitting complaints to the policing service within the stockport community neighbourhood policing teams.    (As above) letter submitted to the police along with attached statement   Chief Superintendant Neil Wain Stockport Police Station Lee Street Stockport Greater Manchester  SK1 3DR Mr M S Parnell 5 Osborne Street Bredbury Stockport SK6 2BT Tel 0161 430 2611 Mob 07857047543 Email mickysara@btinternet.com Date 17th February 2009 Dear Chief Superintendent Neil Wain   Hello Chief Superintendent Neil Wain I hope you are well, I Michael Stewart Parnell write to you. following my visit to Cheadle Heath police Station Sunday 15th February 2009 at 08:00 hrs, on that day I was called there to give statement to the assault that happened on the 11th February 2009 the FWIN number is 1317, 12/02/09. I call upon you to look into this on my behalf and please accordingly write stating why this matter is not being investigated by GMP, this matter on Sunday 15th February 2009 between 15:00 hrs 19:00hrs was brought to the attention of Cheshire Constabulary headquarters at Blacon Chester, the advice I was given there over the four hours attended was that if this matter was put forward to their force they would have to investigate, There was contact between Greater Manchester Police and Cheshire Constabulary on Sunday night, as there was concerns for my safety. I will be truly grateful if you could look into this matter and also answer to the letter I sent to you on 17th January 2009 I have not yet received a reply or acknowledgement, please accept my statement I tried to put forward Sunday morning for the assault 11/02/09 the enclosed 5 pages. Yours Sincerely M S Parnell, esq.                 Tuesday 10:02:2009 16:54 hrs On passing Stopford House to return to my car, Steve (Mr Duggan) came to the doors of the lobby, and shouted to myself “sad mad man you’re an idiot, don’t start taking your pictures” and indicated to the notice on the window, and then said, “in five minutes I’m off duty and then you’ll know about it“. Notice on window Important Notice NO ONE IS PERITTED TO TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS OF COUNCIL BUILDINGS OR STAFF WITHOUT PRIOR ARRANGEMENTS   I have taken photographs and video clip of this notice, but where are the notices warning the public that CCTV is being taken of them, no one has ever got permission by prior arrangement to take images of me, CCTV codes of practice, signs of at least A3 should be displayed to show that images are being monitored, and the recordings are under protection of the data protection Act 1998. Local authorities whose premises have CCTV systems in operation must alert the Information Commissioner that they are gathering personal information about the people they are recording. They must also put up signs at entrances into, to warn the public that recording is taking place. On finishing the writing of these notes and setting of to go to my car I noticed Steve was sat in his parked car , he was parked on the pavement of Edward street opposite the magistrates court between the entrance and exit to garage and snooker club, I started to walk and cross over Piccadilly, he started his car and with his wheels screeching sped towards me, I had my camera in my hand in my pocket I flicked the lens cover open took it out of my pocket, pointed to the oncoming car and got behind bollards, top of Piccadilly, Steve on seeing camera was shouting and swerved to the other side of the road and stopped, with the fear of what he might do I proceeded to Lee Street Police station, Steve had got out of his car and was following me he came into the station shouting to officers that I had his picture on my camera, and he didn’t what me to have it and was insisting that the police took my camera and deleted the picture, this I believe is recorded on the Police’s legal obtained correctly signed CCTV system, the time was approximately 17:20 hrs, Steve was quite aggressive and was told to leave because the matter was a civil one, I don’t know if panic alarm was activated but a number of plain clothed officers came into reception to see what was happening, when a short while had passed I was told it was ok for me to leave and has Steve had gone to the left, I should leave and go to the right, on exiting the door Steve was stood at the top of lee street watching towards police station, I came back through the door and while looking through glass saw Steve turn and leave, I quickly exited the door to the right and went down to Hillgate, I went and got in my car and then drove home, I didn’t rest or sleep very well that evening and night, I believe that Steve, because of what he has commented to me he has got my address from my correspondence in Stopford House and that he and frank know where I live, this is a concern to me I feel he could be capable now of doing something bad. Wednesday 11:02:2009 13:30 hrs Attended Stockport Police Station Lee Street, the purpose of this visit was to discuss last nights incident, and to ask about Chief Superintendent Neil Wain and his reply to my letter 17th January 2009, his secretary was on lunch but the desk clerk passed on information to myself that the request had been sent to Chester House Police Headquarters and I should have had a reply from them by now, was given phone number 856 2534 to contact them as the delay might be to do with data protection issues, I put to the desk clerk about last nights incident and I informed him that the pictures I took last night were still in my camera in the memory and I would not delete them as they are required as evidence, I pointed out about my safety and the security trying to hurt me although the desk clerk was sympathetic the long standing issues being civil he could only advise that I just took care of myself, I left police station and went round to magistrates court there was to be no court sitting that afternoon so I did not stay and decided to, if it was clear check Stopford House to further evidence, no signs too, of CCTV is displayed to public about monitoring and recording of data. Wednesday 11:02:2009 14:00 hrs Arrived Stopford House no one in entrance lobby, entered freely for the purpose to gather evidence of CCTV signs, took a number of pictures from 4 different angles that are of and from the inside of the lobby only, I stood and waited and went no further than the centre of the lobby, Frank the security guard come in and started making suggestions (14:15 Approx) using threatening comments of what he would do and he got on his walkie talkie and called for Steve there was a notice that had been put up that came from GMP about making false allegations and what can be done during February there was also some small cards with on one side telling you what to do, and on the other side showing the word Liar, what is this now in the lobby of Stopford House, Frank pointed to this notice and cards and suggested to me I take one of the cards, which I did and give it to him he just threw it on the floor, Steve arrived and they both, Frank and Steve started and ganged up on me and were making comments to my sanity, I quoted Things must be done within the law, they both replied to this Steve first You think your Perry Mason Frank after Steve then said “More like Ironside, (what I know of Ironside is he was in a wheelchair) I asked Frank does that mean you are going to break my legs, Frank said I didnt say that but thats what it means, third security guard arrives, and the three stood talking then the fourth and fifth security arrive, and all five start talking to me at the same time one guard keeps telling me not to look away from his eyes and keeps repeating why am I there, why am I there, when I try to reply the others keep interrupting and giving their answers, the guard who told me to look at his eyes was not standing for any of this and took me by my right elbow and wrist, someone tried to take my bag this contains my life, I held this close to my body another guard took my left elbow and shoulder and another guard was pushing in my back, I was commenting reasonable force to equal resistance we are not going to move anywhere unable to move my arms and activate my personal attack alarm I tried to stand firm I felt at this time if they carried me out through the doors they were going to push me into the hand rail and throw me down the stairs what happened next was they forced me down to the ground, with being held by my right wrist my hand was pushed hard to the floor with the whole weight of that guard down on it which caused injury of lacerations and stiffening finger joints and tender wrist, it was then said leave it and call the police, Frank was wanting more and two female reception staff were trying to calm him down and take him away he didn’t immediately take their advice he wanted to get at me I had got up and then just stood there waiting for the police to arrive, I saw through the window to Edward street turning right to Piccadilly a fast response police car arrive. The police came into Stopford House, spoke to security Guards and myself and they asked if I would leave, at this time my hand was bleeding, and I was taking in what had happened, I commented to the officer I would leave, and in my mind was trying to think how to put to them what had happened, if I was taken outside, it would again be that I would be told to go on my way, this has happened before when I was previously injured, and also when my property taken or when my laptop was damaged, I understand that the officers have to do what they see is needed, and in me taking time to collect myself together it might have seemed that I was not moving, the officer told me has he had asked me to leave but it seemed I was not doing so he informed me he would have to arrest me to prevent a further breach of the peace this I acknowledge and was arrested and put in the police car and conveyed to Cheadle’s Heath Police Station. I was the one arrested on what the police had been told by security and what they could see, and the long standing issues, it is now about time that this matter is sorted out so the police are no longer being used in the councils unlawful criminal actions. The council again has acted disproportionably, and have stepped well beyond reasonable grounds all I am doing is trying to be patient and wait (the council is sorting things out) I am doing this minding my own business in the glass entrance lobby of Stopford House, What is the lawful restriction imposed legally, I put it to you now there is none, the actions of the council are all unlawful towards myself, the council is taking the law unto themselves and imposing their judgement and punishment as only they see fit, and with no regards to the law. Gang intimidation, five sledgehammers to crack one nut, well this nut has now cracked and blood is spilt that is assault by beating, and it is now required to be reported to prevent further occurrence, or the event of a permanent injury or loss of my life, by others who are already acted unlawfully and are getting away with it. Note:- this is made in relation to the following question, when myself is being asked to leave, this when I am asked to leave, I ask why, the answer I always get is you know why, I do not know why, it is only said to hearsay of a disturbance that could be caused, I have never caused a disturbance, it is the others trying oppress myself in uncovering their unlawfulness (whistleblowing on the council wrongdoings) they have been causing the disturbances in trying to cover up that which I am uncovering, being asked to leave politely or with a gentle hand of encouragement on ones shoulder might be permitted by me (technically an assault) but 1 plus another 3 Persons with force taking hold of my person is unreasonable excessive on anyone’s terms and is totally unacceptable. Wednesday 11:02:2009 14:00 hrs -15:00 hrs Stopford House. Assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Offences against the Person Act 1861 (section 47) Specified offences for the purpose of:- section 224 Criminal Justice Act 2003. This Assault is recorded on SMBC own CCTV Stockport councils representatives acting in a gang caused me to apprehend the fear of unlawful violence and the fear of that with the force of actual bodily contact (assault by beating) has occurred resulting in a bodily injury to my person, There was 5 other person involved that caused this assault, intentionally or recklessly against myself, Two of whom are known to me, one I have seen but don’t know, one that I have not seen before, one also not known that left had been involved in the fear of the act towards myself, the two security guards known to me are :- Mr Steve Duggan, Mr Frank Craughwell, the third guard I believe is their lead security officer, the forth man came in a Solution SK van, the fifth I don’t know and don’t know where he came from. Part of Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council unlawfulness. Butterworths STONES JUSTICES MANUAL PART VI —– Family Law 6-3195a 1, considerations applying to exercise of powers 6-3195b 2, basic definitions 6-3195c 3, maintenance of Adoption Service 6-3195d 4, Assessments etc for Adoption Support Services (1) A local authority must at the request of:- (a) any persons mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (c) of section 3(1) or (b) any other person who falls within a description prescribed by regulations (subject to subsection 7(a)) carry out an assessment of that persons needs for adoption support services. The case is that the Local authority keeps telling me to report the children to the police, how can I do this when I know of their suffering and what are to their needs, the Council has put me in dispute with them over me requesting support under the laws of, the Children’s Act 1989, the Adoption Act 1976, and the Adoption and Children’s Act 2002. I have requested Assessment of Adoption Support Services.         —– Forwarded Message —–
From: Anwar Majothi <anwar.majothi@stockport.gov.uk>
To:mickysara@btinternet.com” <mickysara@btinternet.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 2 May 2012, 10:54
Subject: Re: Your Stage 2 complaints   Dear Mr Parnell,   I write following our meeting on Monday. I would be grateful if you could provide me with the dates, rough times and the names of individuals you have stated have assaulted you; including your recent report last week.   I would be grateful to receive the dates via email and can arrange another meeting with you to go through any additional CCTV footage you have in support of your complaint.   I look forward to hearing from you soon.   Yours sincerely,     Anwar Majothi Corporate Complaints Manager Stopford House Stockport Council SK1 3XE   Tel: 0161 474 3182 Fax: 0161 474 4006 http://www.stockport.gov.uk    
Remember to use your vote in local elections on Thursday 3rd May 2012. For more information about voting and Stockport Council elections go to http://www.stockport.gov.uk/services/councildemocracy/elections/localelections2012/  

Confidentiality:- This email, its contents and any attachments are intended only for the above named. As the email may contain confidential or legally privileged information, if you are not, or suspect that you are not, the above named or the person responsible for delivery of the message to the above named, please delete or destroy the email and any attachments immediately and inform the sender of the error.


You can do more than you think online: Find it. Report it. Apply for it. Pay for it. Visit us at www.stockport.gov.uk and find out more.

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG – www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 3199/6405 – Release Date: 06/12/13



After Mr Parnell’s untimely death, Andrew Stunell MP phoned his family to ask them to vote for him. Talk about nuisance calls!

Stunell MP Posted on Sat, June 05, 2021 14:28


Andrew Stunell LibDem. Competent? I think not.

Stunell MP Posted on Sat, June 05, 2021 14:21

Do we need politicians like ours to run the country – an incompetent MP and his voting commitments, even he himself mistakenly nearly voted against his own amendment.

https://www.planningresource.co.uk/article/1116007/diary



Mr Parnell’s humour – if you give Andew Stunell and extra n, he will claim expenses for it ;o)

Andrew Webb, CYPD, Anwar Majothi, Barry Khan, Eamonn Boylan, Ged Lucas, LibDem Councillors, Stunell MP, Sue Derbyshire, Town Hall Protester Posted on Sat, June 05, 2021 08:52

Dear sheila

              hello, thanks for the spelling, his name only has one “n” we shouldn’t give him more than he deserves, or he might use it against us he is my MP but my initials are MP wonder if MP can or should help MP or whether MP’s should help themselves, give him an extra n and he might claim expenses for it.

Mike

Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange

—–Original Message—–

From: “Sheila Oliver” <sheilaoliver@ntlworld.com>

Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:27:44

To: <mickysara@btinternet.com>

Subject: Re: Failure Notice

Mike

It is Stunell.  Try that.

If he sent you enquiries@andrewstunnell.org.uk then he is deliberately misleading you.  If you have mis-typed it, then we have to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He sent a snotty letter to the Guardian about them spelling his name wrongly (so they kept spelling it incorrectly after that to annoy him)

Hope you are OK

Love

Sheila

—– Original Message —–

From: <mickysara@btinternet.com>

To: “sheila oliver” <sheilaoliver@ntlworld.com>

Cc: <mickysara@btinternet.com>

Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 6:57 PM

Subject: Fw: Failure Notice

> Dear Sheila

>                Hello, mike here just to let you know I received a letter

> from andrew stunnell MP on saturday 6th April 2013 with an email address

> which fails to deliver too, the request I have made to him for his help,,

> see below

> Mike