Stockport Council News

14 July 2009 06:32

c.c. John Schulz

Dear Chief Constable

Mr Parnell had the police called to him twice
yesterday and the Council threatened a third time but when I said they would
have to arrest me too, they immediately backed down.

I don’t quite know what is going on here – Masonic
links maybe – but you are putting your career on the line for this madcap case.
The national press is now interested (evidence available on
request).

If we look at the costs of this case – and I will
in minute detail – 86 times the police have been called, 10 arrests, 2 court
cases and now – I am guessing the High Court costs – for a sneeze is a scandal!
I am sure you will be aware as I am of the mood of anger in the country in times
of deep recession with various fat cat chief executives, bent MPs and insane
waste of taxpayers’ hard earned money.

May I respectfully suggest that the police don’t
respond when called out by Stockport Council to Mr. Parnell. He has not been
allowed to walk on any pavement in the town. Have you any idea what the red top
press would make of that alone?

I shall be keeping a watching brief.

Yours sincerely

Sheila

15 July 2009 19:18

Leader <leader@stockport.gov.uk>; Chief.Constable@gmp.police.uk <Chief.Constable@gmp.police.uk>; John Schultz <chief.executive@stockport.gov.uk>
Cllr Mark Weldon <cllr.mark.weldon@stockport.gov.uk>; Cllr David White <cllr.david.white@stockport.gov.uk>; MICHAEL PARNELL <mickysara@btinternet.com>; alan.rusbridger@guardian.co.uk <alan.rusbridger@guardian.co.uk>

Dear Sirs

I had to sit through a community police report at
tonight’s council meeting wherein it was explained that the local police were
unable to deal with the current level of crime, whilst outside Mr. Parnell had
the police called to him for the 87th time for his peaceful protest. I assume
he was arrested yet again for the 11th time.

Also, I said to Councillor White I would be
exercising my legal right to stand outside polling stations showing people who
approached me the Harcourt Street School contamination documents, and the
policeman said tonight the police would have to man all the polling stations in
North Reddish because of some threat. Do the police mean my right to exercise
my legal duty to stand on the pavement, not approaching anyone and showing
interested parties documents was a threat to the elections necessitating police
presence at every polling station all day? If so, then no wonder we have no
police free to deal with crime – they are being tied up doing the futile
bidding of Stockport Council.

You really couldn’t make it up.

Yours

Sheila

11 July 2009 07:04

Dear Mr Khan

You know what a gentle man Mr. Parnell is because
you spoke to him at length. I will have you for what has gone on here. You
should lose your job for this and I will do my utmost to see that you
do.

Please let me know whether Mr. Parnell is allowed
to enter polling stations under the terms of his ridiculous CRASBO.

You remain my humble servant

Sheila

23 May 2009 09:45

Chief.Constable@gmp.police.uk

Dear Chief Constable

I have now had a stalling reply from Stockport’s
police commander. If an effort is being made to make out that Mr Parnell is mad
– and I can assure you he isn’t – then I must point out the case of the lady who
jumped off the Humber Bridge with her 9-year-old autistic son. Stockport
Council issued an-after-the-event report pointing out that she was mad. I doubt
it, somehow, but driven to suicide by Stockport Council is a definite
possibility. I am trying to establish the facts in that case and the issue is
with the Information Commission currently. I have to point out that any
inference on behalf of the police that Mr. Parnell is in any way mentally
unstable will be vehemently disputed.

What an utter waste of police time this has all
been – especially the incident of calling the police when he made one comment
from the public gallery at a full council meeting and not one council officer
would remain to explain to the police why they had been called. That would seem
to me to be a criminal offence of wasting police time.

We will get to the bottom of all this however long
it takes.

May I respectfully suggest that the Council are
told to sort out this gentleman’s problems with regards to his human rights and
his adopted daughters’ human rights and stop wasting police and court
time.

I shall cc this to the local press and the Editor
of the Guardian for their information.

Kind regards

Sheila

Mr Parnell was acquitted in a 3 day, £10,000 per day Crown Court Appeal of the ludicrious offence of an assault with a sneeze and this is the CCTV the police, the Council, the CPS and the courts had of the non-offence. I smell Masonic corruption.

http://www.sheilaoliver.org/smbc-cctv-evidence.html

This email was copied to Nick Clegg

02 May 2009 07:21

Dear Councillor White

There was no spitting incident as I understand it
and no evidence of mucus on the security guard. We shall see how the court
case pans out and get the transcript under the FOI if possible. If the Council
drops it again further wasting police and court time, I assume there will be no
doubt it was all lies and compensation payments will large.

You seem to treat political opponents, whom I
assume don’t agree with you, with contempt in the local newspaper.

Can you justify the police having been called 64
times to Mr. Parnell, once I believe in response to his making a comment from
the public gallery at a full council meeting that Councillor Derbyshire had
sneezed and should be arrested? No-one from the Council would even wait after
the meeting for the police arrive and Mr. Parnell had to wait alone outside for
the police to come to explain why they had been called, so as not to further
waste police time.

I think as an Executive Councillor of a Council
which has been unreasonably harassing a peaceful protester and who was informed
twice at public meetings what was going on, then, of course, you are
involved.

I hope to obtain evidence from the police and the
courts under the FOIA of this utter and malicious waste of police and court
time, and will hopefully expose this in the press.

As further evidence of this rotten borough council,
when it was pointed out at the last full council meeting that the names,
addresses and signatures of questioners had been up on the Council’s website for
months, no action was taken to correct that Data Protection abuse and remove
those details till the following Monday afternoon, and even then this was only
done because a council taxpayer affected contacted the police and the
Information Commission. At that meeting were all the senior council officers,
executive councillors – even one who worked in a senior position at the Data
Protection arm of the Information Commission, yet no-one took anything seriously
because basically no-one senior at the Council ever listens to the
public.

I think the contempt I feel for LibDem councillors
and MPs, always spouting their concern for the environment yet simultaneously
wanting to put a £1billion bypass through the Goyt Valley, is very
justified.

With warmest best wishes

Sheila

—– Original Message —–

From: David White

To: Sheila Oliver

Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 2:54 AM

Subject: RE: Mr Parnell

Sheila,

Having
heard the Security Guards view of the event I am disgusted by this “inflicting
and a cold”, my description would be very different and Council staff should not
be subjected to this.

Spitting
on someone is not a “gentle, peaceful” act.

If
he has been arrested, I have neither been involved or partaken in the event.
Let justice take its course.

Like
yourself you are entitled to your opinion but you treat people who don’t agree
with you with contempt and never listen to them.

Dave

David
White

5
Harry Road

Stockport

SK5
6TX

0161-474-3379
(Work)

0161-443-1090
(Home)

07891-949266
(Mobile)

Dear Councillor White.

How can they lack one thing among many?

I sent you masses of evidence over Harcourt Street
– I don’t suppose you bothered to read any of it.

I asked at the Executive meeting twice about him.
Maybe you had nodded off. I gave all Executive councillors the chance to
condemn what was being done to him. Not one did.

He has had the police called to him 64 times. He
is in court on May 14th charged with assault with a sneeze with intent to
inflict a council employee with a cold. He has been taken to court before by
the Council only to have the case dropped on the day it was to be heard. He is
a gentle, peaceful man. I don’t suppose you have ever taken the trouble to
actually talk to him. A High Court judge has ruled that he mustn’t have his
case heard by magistrates, as they won’t be impartial. So his case is to be
heard by a judge.

Suicide is a possibility for him and his daughters
– the compensation costs would be massive, never mind the toll of human
misery.

Take the trouble to find out – I pay you
enough.

Yours

Sheila

—– Original Message —–

From: David White

To: Sheila Oliver

Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:21 PM

Subject: RE: Mr Parnell

Sheila,

Your
emails always just lack one thing, among many.

I
don’t know about Mr Parnell, my only dealings with him have been his appearing
at my Area Committee asking a public question.

Evidence!

Dave

David
White

5
Harry Road

Stockport

SK5
6TX

0161-474-3379
(Work)

0161-443-1090
(Home)

07891-949266
(Mobile)

01 May 2009 19:10

Cllr Dave Goddard <cllr.dave.goddard@stockport.gov.uk>; Cllr Mark Weldon <cllr.mark.weldon@stockport.gov.uk>; David White <dwhite1972@btinternet.com>; cllr.sue.derbyshire@stockport.gov.uk <cllr.sue.derbyshire@stockport.gov.uk>; cllr.shan.alexander@stockport.gov.uk <cllr.shan.alexander@stockport.gov.uk>; cllr.stuart.bodsworth@stockport.gov.uk <cllr.stuart.bodsworth@stockport.gov.uk>; martin.candler@stockport.gov.uk <martin.candler@stockport.gov.uk>; cllr.john.pantall@stockport.gov.uk <cllr.john.pantall@stockport.gov.uk>

Dear Executive Councillors

I have twice in the past drawn your attention to
what is happening regarding Mr. Parnell. All of you refused to express any
concern whatsoever.

Please see the attached. I would appear there is a
legal right to peaceful protest. I think the damages the Council will have to
pay Mr. Parnell will be huge for the 64 times the police were called and his
repeated stay in police cells. I assume your insurers won’t cover this illegal
activity, as they have financial problems of their own, and that this
compensation will have to come from council taxpayers’ money.

What a shame none of you acted to stop this abuse
within reasonable timescales.

I hope neither Mr Parnell nor his daughters commit
suicide, which is a possibility; in that tragic eventuality the Council will
have to pay out tens of millions of pounds.

Yours in disgust at what you allow to continue in
this rotten borough.

Sheila