Stockport Council News

The police have recently made it clear Mr Parnell was never guilty of any offence whatsoever.

I have made a FOI request of Keir Starmer, Director of Public Prosectutions, requesting documents pertaining to all the proceedings against Mr Parnell. I wrote to him three times previously; he could have acted to help Mr Parnell but he chose not to – with tragic results.

In one of the letters below appears the following prescient comment from me:- “

Very soon we will be reading in the press of the death of Mr. Parnell or his daughters and crocodile tears will be shed by the crocodiles at Stockport Council.”

What I also now need to know is why Crown Prosecution Service paralegal John Derbyshire (any relation to Leader of Stockport Council Sue Derbyshire – a leading persecutor of Mr Parnell?), presumably for the purposes of continuing to persecute Mr Parnell maintained that Fred Perry House was simply a re-naming of Ponsonby House. What a liar he is!

These documents can be more clearly read here – http://www.sheilaoliver.org/town-hall-protester.html

http://wirralinittogether.wordpress.com/2013/10/10/foi-news-the-ico-issues-a-12-page-mauling-of-wirral-council/

“I’ll tell you what; they tend to get rid of precisely the wrong people at Wirral Council don’t they? But that’s how abuse festers isn’t it? One or two ‘bad apples’ in positions of power, moral compass set to “gone west”, bigging each other up, employing their chumz, targeting and clearing out ‘troublemakers’, then scraping the barrel by treating their public as the ‘enemy’, to be engaged in battle, brought down and “crushed” by whatever means available…

…then before you know it, a reign of fear takes hold, the fish starts to rot, and the stench rises… Haha. Shouldn’t laugh though eh…?Because this is deadly serious.

Today at least, here is a victory for common sense, and the legitimate and compelling public interest. This is a line in the sand, however small, however thin, but it’s still a form of reckoning. They’ve been caught out bullying and abusing and simply CAN’T be allowed to continue flexing those muscles… over and over, with zero accountability.”

These are those responsible past and present for not allowing this matter to be raised. In the event of the death of a child, hopefully they will face corporate manslaughter charges. Wouldn’t you have thought with her track record of already having caused a death, Councillor Shan Alexander would act a bit more responsibly?

The Executive Councillors are still banning questions on this subject as “vexatious”. Should anyone be voting for these unaccountable, dangerous people?

All through the long Vale View School process I and other people have pointed out the very dangerous traffic situation they would be creating. They banned me asking any council meeting or FOI questions on this subject since circa 2006.

Within one month of the school opening the police had complained to the Council about the dangerous traffic situation, as had many local residents. Have the Executive Councillors apologised to me? No, of course not, and they are still banning questions from me as of 21/10/13.

This is the nature of area where they put their toxic school:-

The entrance to the school is where the blue asterisk is on the photo below. Half of the houses in the photo below have to leave the area down narrow Mill Lane past the school. What sort of dangerous lunatics would put a school and a school entrance there? Answer, LibDem lunatics and dodgy council officers.
This is the police reporting their genuine concerns:

The above document can be more clearly read here – http://www.sheilaoliver.org/traffic.html

I was completely correct about the traffic, as I was regarding the school being built too small. I lost a child in a road accident, which was nobody’s fault.
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/dedication.html

How dare these appalling LibDems councillors accuse me of being vexatious for raising genuine road safety concerns around a primary school – concerns shared by the police. Don’t vote for these dangerous lunatics.
The above document can be more clearly read here –http://www.sheilaoliver.org/traffic.html

A couple of days before the planning meeting, the Highways Officer, Nick Whelan, said he hadn’t realised how big the school was going to be and the traffic arrangements were inadequate. Why had this man only just realised – I had had a meeting with him six months previously to point this very matter out.

The documents below can be more easily read at – http://www.sheilaoliver.org/not-big-enough-one-year-on.html

28th April 2006

“..this building will be designed to teach 525 children …… CM (Colin Manning) produced C&YPD’s (Children and Young People’s Directorate) predictions of 563 children if all children currently at the Firtree and North Reddish are offered places.”

They had in October 2005 published an official notice promising all parents who wanted a place at the new school could have one – a promise they could never deliver.

They went on to come up with potential solutions – restrict numbers to 525, provide temporary classrooms until the roll dropped to around 525, increase class sizes, which was felt by said Colin Manning to be cramming children in and unacceptable from an education point of view according to him or they could build new classroom to accommodate the extra children, but the development was so tight for space this was never an option.

In response to a FOI request from me they admitted the birth rate in the area was rising sharply, so the school was never going to be big enough whatever they did.

WHY BUILD IT THEN? WHY NOT BUILD ON THE FIR TREE SITE OR RENOVATE THE EXISTING SCHOOLS? ANSWER, BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO FLOG OFF THE FIR TREE SITE FOR HOUSING AND WERE NOT INTERESTED AT ANY POINT IN THE WELFARE OF THE CHILDREN.

The executive councillors were warned several years ago, as were Director of Children’s Services Andrew Webb and Deputy Director Donna Sager, why waste £10million of council taxpayers’ money on a school which was always going to be too small?

Within one year of the Vale View School opening they were talking of having to re-open the old North Reddish School. They have now spent a fortune expanding Broadstone School, which is nowhere near.

The people responsible for this offence under the Fraud Act 2006 (it is an offence to act deliberately to cause someone a loss) then branded me as vexatious for raising the matter with them. No accountability at Stockport Council under the LibDems! Sager and Webb, responsible for a massive loss to the counciltaxpayer which they were aware of all through this project, banned all questions from me as being “vexatious”. They were merely covering up their own fraudulent actions.

As of 21st October 2013 all Executive Councillors are still banning all questions from me about this school as “vexatious”, as they have done for many years. They themselves are committing an offence under the Fraud Act 2006, as it is an offence to block access to documents pertaining to a fraud.

These are the Executive Councillors, past and present, responsible for blocking evidence along with Barry Khan, Council Solicitor and Eamonn Boylan, Chief Executive:

Susan Derbyshire, Leader
Mark Weldon
Martin Candler
Shan Alexander
Stuart Bodsworth
Keith Holloway
Wendy Meikle
Kevin Hogg
John Smith
David White
Iain Roberts

These people consider themselves unaccountable, so why vote for them?